From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [69.77.167.62] (helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-84921-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Knnhf-0004mC-Ef
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:04:47 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 905BFE04B6;
	Thu,  9 Oct 2008 05:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0D3E04B6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Oct 2008 05:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so4431717wff.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=FV+rKeMfhZSHtaLzz6ITRJCFxixaBIRypApvBiezHoY=;
        b=hTaWr+I6vPJpH8LeiML5vePUf2juWJUMP/nGYfc7chNPRzBcYE6mDDC34uMbugvzsi
         lA2RLtp3RX807Kvd2VZeWhEzkoTHQMGk61Dn1/K1t0darWdowEU5mEILERjFYbFiDXDm
         5Ht+PoIhq5Ej0uC9SwXHBx99/YB3PiA8ol2z0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=GyugcZREPFS1BeTuLikB2g5hCx4Lrg5I36ExCXHh5neGFVQ6IV9GlcJ0sC8pqT1ec5
         m93CsuwihEQhPQoyrhiCAeigpWTlCEbP4j0Znd7Sov4pQ686xK3VeNEd8dgi3z6vRLON
         cZVLzkzhxfzYxP70SC9/vT6G2mAHblmvxuZPo=
Received: by 10.142.178.2 with SMTP id a2mr4082301wff.160.1223528683740;
        Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.40.6 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e38d12ff0810082204h70f19be1h9035a8bd941cdffb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 01:04:43 -0400
From: "Andrey Vul" <andrey.vul@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reopen: OpenOffice dies on startup
In-Reply-To: <9acccfe50810082032m6a4b92a2p316d90fee3bceb21@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <9acccfe50810051631q1c7b884h741a9e18591b01fc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200810080750.32722.dirk.heinrichs.ext@nsn.com>
	 <48ED2740.4000106@gmail.com>
	 <200810082328.50188.dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
	 <9acccfe50810081455s7e10d532i254160be1d0b7dc3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e38d12ff0810081828l7dd1437bx6505d7e2860b1deb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9acccfe50810082032m6a4b92a2p316d90fee3bceb21@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: ea5f4619-efa6-4555-9882-8416e385ac13
X-Archives-Hash: 50b18de8cbe50fd5045cbde9ab77ef6a

On an 1.7 GHz Ahtlon Xp with 768 MB of SDR133, it takes about 8 hours
if X is *not* running and there are no other emerges nor anything else
that is CPU-/RAM-hunry. Basically, turn off X and your research
programs for up to 12 hours. nice -n -20 can shave your emerge time
even more, at the risk of decreased system responsiveness.
The only thing that takes a day or two is emerge -uvD --with-bdeps=y world .
Gentoo requires patience, with the reward of fast code. I actually
enjoy waiting for compiles to finish, so much so that I install from
stage 1 if possible and only use stage 3 if I have to get Gentoo
working in a short amount of time. At least the compiling makes a very
good screensaver :D

On 10/8/08, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/8/08, Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@online.de> wrote:
>>>>  > > Am Mittwoch 08 Oktober 2008 04:23:35 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
>>>>  > > Why did you choose Gentoo, then? Only by compiling OOo, you will
>>>> get one
>>>>  > > that fits into _your_ system.
>>>
>>> For me, the reasons are
>>> 1. I wanted Gentoo for the toolchain and the things I'm developing.
>>> These are the things where I wanted support tailored to my 2xXeon (4
>>> core) system.
>>>
>>> 2. I've been using Oo-bin because it worked, and efficiency didn't
>>> matter because
>>> I don't even use it every week.  Compiling it takes a day or so and
>>> accordingly it was spending more time compiling than I was spending
>>> using it.  Now it no longer works and I'll probably use Word on my
>>> wife's laptop.  But I won't like it.
>> Your system is 4 core and it takes a day to compile OOo? Something
>> sounds very off.
>> Honestly, my 3 year old laptop which has 1 core and a 1.8 GHz Turion
>> with 2GB of DDR333 takes 4 hours to compile.
>> What are you running apart from emerge (e.g. X, firefox, etc.)?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrey Vul
>
> This is a 6-year-old desktop, 1.6 GHz, 2 GB original DDR memory.
>
> I run KDE and sometimes a bunch of compute-bound research tasks of my
> own creation.
>
> I haven't compiled it in so long I may be confusing it with gnome or
> KDE or any of that collection of things that monopolize my machine
> from time to time.  A couple of years back I went to 'bin' on things I
> don't use much, and did some trimming on modular packages like KDE to
> cut down my emerge times.  There are just so many times when I want to
> break in to fool with some hardware and I'm loath to do it during an
> emerge.  I just think of these measures as saving me days of emerging
> from time to time.
>
> ++ kevin
>
> --
> Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
>
>


-- 
Andrey Vul

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?