From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-182832-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7BC1382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat,  3 Mar 2018 03:05:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53D55E0B01;
	Sat,  3 Mar 2018 03:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [IPv6:2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe26:8849])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0DAEE0A43
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  3 Mar 2018 03:05:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from REDACTED (tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net [8.44.145.194])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w2335QSr029096
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:05:27 -0600
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v0.1.0 tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net w2335QSr029096
Authentication-Results: tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net; arc=none header.d=tnetconsulting.net
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=tnetconsulting.net; s=2015; t=1520046327;
	cv=none; b=UPlqZXRwDyq5ODvJg6+n4el6ktK2oOdTLZCu3ofrRW6iLJTTulxTBTbUMpFnMdXmt3ErLrhJYUTbgvbvm3oJ3cO+ZhlBjvlI9LOHtVGUaJJ+tjStUIsNGi+VTBo1151hERDn3xhdSxxaol+FeXgwAeOA3rp6ZKo4e2I5DsYPwvo=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=tnetconsulting.net; s=2015;
	t=1520046327; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=6tTY9Brfp7RpYKNqJnLR3V8ZfYifpEXoSs9CRHnmRxY=;
	h=From:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Language:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BLUnpBos60ZsBVFnMA2267ojJduIRTQONoe1WPJHfGeXQG03Lg6Fqg9hECb+UEgjqTQjC0M2/3//A/wuFZG7VOv0hUBgyby+GmW4xkMG0dTn/9QVLa4zVrvZkE/+5n6fGnZum5WAZuElEjwMefCEvCFHmqhIS7OHkaG+jlCMtPo=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net; none
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@gentoo.tnetconsulting.net>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Bouncing Messages
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <aa78567a-3db9-2749-19bf-a280027e87f1@gmail.com>
 <20180301234827.5a070e07@x220.linux.gnu>
 <20180301235317.olvztnl3i7eeuut2@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
 <b9f589dd-a2a7-348a-2f5b-51a382295970@gmail.com>
 <20180302042152.psssgej7ctok2go2@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
 <20180302044541.3ghfup6pglgds3hd@31c0.net>
 <7b80215b-f60b-19c5-1aa4-b962300c59b9@gmail.com>
 <20180302110416.mc5ugtyp7vst2skg@31c0.net>
 <20180302163623.66my6gmoc4hhdb36@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
 <5dc7f190-80c6-62e8-4bed-8737b974641f@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
 <20180303004701.lceudotgx3hoqng2@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
Organization: TNet Consulting
Message-ID: <e271a778-e327-7eda-90c7-ff8ba550445e@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 20:06:09 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180303004701.lceudotgx3hoqng2@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4a2e86ed-fd76-43ec-b5ce-9335694b5bc8
X-Archives-Hash: 33ce56960d5bd079bd6b37c990c37000

On 03/02/2018 05:47 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Flam^H^H^H^H value judgments aside, does DMARC also change the long 
> standing standard of sending rejections to the envelope address?

No, DMARC should not change the principle operation of SMTP, save for 
additional checks that messages must pass.  All other aspects of sending 
email should be the same.

MTAs should continue to send bounces back to the SMTP envelope address. 
Though, ideally the MTA would reject the message during SMTP time 
instead of accepting and bouncing the message.

DMARC does offer the ability to have reports about DMARC failures sent 
to the domain publishing the DMARC record.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die