From: "Mike Huber" <michael.huber@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 64bit vs 32bit
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:26:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1a7ee0c0606202226p716cc284qcc4c91f87d86a2e4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606192343.10340.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
My understanding is that the major advantage of the 64-bit processors
is for memory address space (>4Gigs of virtual memory space without
PAE, technically 48 bits of address space, which is something like
128Terrabytes of addressable memory).
There must be some advantage associated with being able to hold two
long ints in one register (or some such relationship there). Anyone
know detailed explanations for situations where 64-bit is more/less
beneficial and why?
--Mike
On 6/19/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:
> On Monday 19 June 2006 20:26, kashani wrote:
> > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > you don't need a chroot.
> > >
> > > Just emerge firefox-bin for flash
> > > and
> > > mplayer-bin for wmv files.
> > >
> > > Everything else does not make problems.
> >
> > Depending on the video files you'd like to decode 32bit can make a
> > difference. Many of the stranger codecs are supported through the win32
> > codecs which are not 64bit safe or at least that's what I've read. I'd
> > assume that qt, mp4, and wmv would generally be okay.
>
> and this 'strange' codecs are covered by mplayer-bin too.
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-21 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-16 19:15 [gentoo-user] 64bit vs 32bit Catalin Trifu
2006-06-16 19:22 ` Justin R Findlay
2006-06-16 19:22 ` Lord Sauron
2006-06-16 21:09 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-06-19 12:02 ` Pete Pardoe
2006-06-19 12:23 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-06-19 12:35 ` Gian Domeni Calgeer
2006-06-19 13:54 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-06-19 14:24 ` Gian Domeni Calgeer
2006-06-19 14:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-06-19 18:26 ` kashani
2006-06-19 21:43 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-06-21 5:26 ` Mike Huber [this message]
2006-06-21 12:28 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1a7ee0c0606202226p716cc284qcc4c91f87d86a2e4@mail.gmail.com \
--to=michael.huber@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox