From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKHS6-0001SM-M3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:33:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8RFOgnG005952; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:24:42 GMT Received: from qproxy.gmail.com (qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.197]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8RFIOcN021274 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:18:25 GMT Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f10so529799qba for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:25:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jgvWIYx1oZsMxYwJgQJqh3qVD+RVZ2Jkv+DOva3+KwlgJ249e72LxAf7BoOy6NOU7D/JtSI9b7f1XzT9Uxiblkh7Mt1Y6U0RTOuR4H+JloL/fYIkhlHqNl4O2LUlhfXc4RDFMrpi2tYFJSm2Z2coLgat6gQU4vFmgFxHzoRTWmI= Received: by 10.64.249.16 with SMTP id w16mr636777qbh; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.43.16 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:25:25 -0400 From: Phill MV To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Weird "Buffer I/O error" in dev ndb0 In-Reply-To: <43390AEF.1090904@planet.nl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_36825_15573494.1127834725142" References: <4339055E.6080907@web.de> <43390AEF.1090904@planet.nl> X-Archives-Salt: 528a5c87-ccc2-42a9-963f-f1672a32feb2 X-Archives-Hash: 0159de0ca4df2c63211768ef4188a943 ------=_Part_36825_15573494.1127834725142 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline That makes me feel much better. On a related note, shouldn't we be filing bug reports, then? Yes, I was getting the same errors/warnings; it finally annoyed me so > much that I recompiled the kernel without NBD support, since I couldn't > find any suggestion that I actually needed it, and all was well after > that. Certainly I didn't find that anything which had been working got > broke due to the removal-- but that wasn't a big surprise, since the > errors/warnings suggested that a function was being probed that did not > exist anyway (so I wasn't actually using NBD in the first place, which > was what it seemed to be complaining about). > > HTH, > Holly > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > ------=_Part_36825_15573494.1127834725142 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
That makes me feel much better.
On a related note, shouldn't we be filing bug reports, then?
 

Y= es, I was getting the same errors/warnings; it finally annoyed me so
muc= h that I recompiled the kernel without NBD support, since I couldn't
find any suggestion that I actually needed it, and all was well afterthat. Certainly I didn't find that anything which had been working gotbroke due to the removal-- but that wasn't a big surprise, since the
errors/warnings suggested that a function was being probed that did not
= exist anyway (so I wasn't actually using NBD in the first place, which
w= as what it seemed to be complaining about).

HTH,
Holly
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailin= g list


------=_Part_36825_15573494.1127834725142-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list