From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6082D1382C5 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 17:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 601F1E0A80; Sat, 16 May 2020 17:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com (mail-qt1-f195.google.com [209.85.160.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2E7BE09C1 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 17:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id t25so4739060qtc.0 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:04:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=1tx2H+MjvV1lFNPhdqbhicRNiLZwlEFn2WQ94bkefzM=; b=BDyQbMd+ugW4ljfcxmTy5pByk/dNTzGUIQtB/nCgW5mNE4sX31Jk/HoC7liAFhu5iL JSiBkaws42VgtPgYInPXDDbbiWGJtM9U4P+EyegUAP2CJPcV5/8uX9nl2QI5OrA64KZg TllP+CphRgNh//Pg0qwYig2pmBe9Op/w2R+wQ7YMeMYwx0SWqNkzpkm+arpN9xsG5ldD q0XQtje2msoQ6ZsYJ+YhUQ+HUxuaje+bsHSX7QebJeFTY/E5s+N5N0YpbxpSLIiJL4N4 hIp6AO6y8HOpcXvnl3JvE8x3uT9m5J39FLeyWbtqUX5+CPwk4YPzxqLCYxybFgrMXYBw nXrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wtl9DtokzT9v1/pdk6NkLZvktDzmPsKD8mbcthv9T5WVmt/0S fGT2A8FX39bnvt9CtD2tcpyKRQYDMMYilA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC90vSrT98ySjWY6N0Kc8NL9+qomEWzX6mJalokKh7srOW3R0w1dv7GKsN6xRwdmXwq1zFrQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:518f:: with SMTP id c15mr8722413qtn.142.1589648686874; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (c-76-23-130-96.hsd1.ct.comcast.net. [76.23.130.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z18sm4687314qti.47.2020.05.16.10.04.46 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 May 2020 10:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds for telegram To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <30425f04-1d8d-f436-fed7-001d9bacd434@web.de> <8efe54cf-9f52-db5b-8c2c-82175d5e98e1@gmail.com> <519ee87f-bb46-7dc5-bab6-a28eca6cf975@web.de> <7c037aa9-9c1f-eb2a-9be0-3e63ace5c730@web.de> <98d143be-c86a-df85-d45c-73f511a4bf38@web.de> <52af2b71-1d8d-b39c-0e2b-d52636bf8501@users.sourceforge.net> <3Y7RDS7B.VFOS37AU.DJCQW3A5@RKYEXFQS.RIVREE2Q.PRF3FHBP> <0aaccb91-8f5e-b859-73d0-f1660cc5ae76@web.de> From: Jack Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 13:04:45 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0aaccb91-8f5e-b859-73d0-f1660cc5ae76@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US-large X-Archives-Salt: 690f4978-9c06-4c21-ad75-2e70fe4eab6b X-Archives-Hash: efbffb12437bba13322de16dfe19d39b On 5/16/20 12:23 PM, n952162 wrote: > Oh oh oh! Are you saying ... given "..." in this: > >  Synopsis: emerge [options] [action] [ebuild | tbz2file | file | @set | > atom] ... > > that the solution to my problems is to - for each conflict - to select > one of the two and put it on the same command line? > > e.g: > >     sudo emerge -av =sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3 > =app-portage/gemato-14.3  =dev-python/setuptools-44.1.0 > dev-python/certifi-2019.11.28 Maybe.  The issue is to first understand (for each slot conflict) what is pulling in each of the conflicting versions.  The newer version is probably being pulled in as the default (highest version not flagged or masked or ...).  The older version is likely being pulled in by an older version of some other package. Rather than specifying specific version, just include the other package also. The basic idea is to upgrade as few packages at a time as possible - but you can't do just one because of these conflicts. So starting with "emerge -1 portage" and seeing the older version of portage is being pulled in by gentookit, just "emerge -1 portage gentoolkit". You may have to go through many iterations to find a set of packages which will cleanly upgrade together. > > > On 05/16/20 18:16, Jack wrote: >> On 2020.05.16 11:56, n952162 wrote: >>> Okay, I'm blocked here, at the very beginning: >>> >>>    sys-apps/portage:0 >>> >>>       (sys-apps/portage-*2.3.89-r3:0*/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for >>>    merge) pulled in by >>>         =sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3 (Argument) >>> >>>       (sys-apps/portage-*2.3.49:0/0*::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >>> sys-apps/portage[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)] >>> >>>    required by (app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) >>> >>> I'm trying to update from 2.3.49 to 2.3.89 and it tells me it has a >>> slot >>> conflict there.  I can hardly delete portage and then add it ... >> First, if you post a slot conflict, post the whole thing. (This one >> is OK, but your previous one for gentoolkit only showed one of the two >> entries.  In this case, you probably need to upgrade gentoolkit and >> portage at the same time. >> >>> >>> >>> On 05/16/20 17:38, n952162 wrote: >>>> >>>> e.g. >>>> >>>> sudo emerge -av =*sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3 >>>> * >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ? >>>> >>>> I got (amongst tons of other stuff): >>>> >>>>  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be >>>>  * installed at the same time on the same system. >>>> >>>>   (app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled >>>> in by >>>>     app-portage/gentoolkit required by @selected >>>> >>>> On 05/16/20 16:19, Jack wrote: >>>>> On 5/16/20 8:53 AM, n952162 wrote: >>>>>> I did an emerge --sync and then "emerge -v1 portage" and it blew >>>>>> up all >>>>>> over the place.  Log in the attachment. >>>>>> >>>>>> How can I get things reestablished?  Or, does gentoo simply >>>>>> require a >>>>>> smarter user than me, and I should go back to ubuntu? >>>>> >>>>> I think the bottom line is that Gentoo needs to be updated more often >>>>> than yearly.  Others may also comment, but right now, I think a >>>>> reinstall might be easier than working through all the problems, >>>>> unless you are trying to learn more about how things work. >>>>> >>>>> My first question is why you have portage-9999 unmasked? I suggest >>>>> going for the lowest version currently in the tree.  I'm not sure if >>>>> your first step should really be portage itself, or upgrading >>>>> packages where the installed version is now masked due to security >>>>> errors or being too out of date. >>>>> >>>>> Jack >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/14/20 23:36, Rich Freeman wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:10 PM n952162 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 05/14/20 22:46, Rich Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:13 PM n952162 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Action: sync for repo: gentoo, returned code = 0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>     * An update to portage is available. It is _highly_ >>>>>>>>>> recommended >>>>>>>>>>     * that you update portage now, before any other packages are >>>>>>>>>> updated. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>     * To update portage, run 'emerge --oneshot portage' now. >>>>>>>>> ...and?  Did you update portage as it was _highly_ recommended >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> you do so first?  What version of portage are you using? This >>>>>>>>> appears >>>>>>>>> on the top line of emerge --info. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ emerge --info >>>>>>>> Portage 2.3.49 (python 3.6.5-final-0, default/linux/x86/17.0, >>>>>>>> gcc-7.3.0, >>>>>>>> glibc-2.26-r7, 4.14.65-gentoo x86_64) >>>>>>> That version of portage has been removed from the repo for over a >>>>>>> year. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would update your system so that is current and then try >>>>>>> again.  I >>>>>>> believe that version of portage should still support EAPI 7 but >>>>>>> there >>>>>>> could be some other issue that is giving it problems with more >>>>>>> recent >>>>>>> packages in the tree. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > >