From: Jack <ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds for telegram
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 13:04:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de9d8bf6-54ec-9ce8-32e5-b4b70d9283f3@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0aaccb91-8f5e-b859-73d0-f1660cc5ae76@web.de>
On 5/16/20 12:23 PM, n952162 wrote:
> Oh oh oh! Are you saying ... given "..." in this:
>
> Synopsis: emerge [options] [action] [ebuild | tbz2file | file | @set |
> atom] ...
>
> that the solution to my problems is to - for each conflict - to select
> one of the two and put it on the same command line?
>
> e.g:
>
> sudo emerge -av =sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3
> =app-portage/gemato-14.3 =dev-python/setuptools-44.1.0
> dev-python/certifi-2019.11.28
Maybe. The issue is to first understand (for each slot conflict) what
is pulling in each of the conflicting versions. The newer version is
probably being pulled in as the default (highest version not flagged or
masked or ...). The older version is likely being pulled in by an older
version of some other package. Rather than specifying specific version,
just include the other package also.
The basic idea is to upgrade as few packages at a time as possible - but
you can't do just one because of these conflicts. So starting with
"emerge -1 portage" and seeing the older version of portage is being
pulled in by gentookit, just "emerge -1 portage gentoolkit". You may
have to go through many iterations to find a set of packages which will
cleanly upgrade together.
>
>
> On 05/16/20 18:16, Jack wrote:
>> On 2020.05.16 11:56, n952162 wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm blocked here, at the very beginning:
>>>
>>> sys-apps/portage:0
>>>
>>> (sys-apps/portage-*2.3.89-r3:0*/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
>>> merge) pulled in by
>>> =sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3 (Argument)
>>>
>>> (sys-apps/portage-*2.3.49:0/0*::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>>> sys-apps/portage[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]
>>>
>>> required by (app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>>>
>>> I'm trying to update from 2.3.49 to 2.3.89 and it tells me it has a
>>> slot
>>> conflict there. I can hardly delete portage and then add it ...
>> First, if you post a slot conflict, post the whole thing. (This one
>> is OK, but your previous one for gentoolkit only showed one of the two
>> entries. In this case, you probably need to upgrade gentoolkit and
>> portage at the same time.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/16/20 17:38, n952162 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> e.g.
>>>>
>>>> sudo emerge -av =*sys-apps/portage-2.3.89-r3
>>>> <https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.3.89-r3.ebuild>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> I got (amongst tons of other stuff):
>>>>
>>>> * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
>>>> * installed at the same time on the same system.
>>>>
>>>> (app-portage/gentoolkit-0.4.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled
>>>> in by
>>>> app-portage/gentoolkit required by @selected
>>>>
>>>> On 05/16/20 16:19, Jack wrote:
>>>>> On 5/16/20 8:53 AM, n952162 wrote:
>>>>>> I did an emerge --sync and then "emerge -v1 portage" and it blew
>>>>>> up all
>>>>>> over the place. Log in the attachment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can I get things reestablished? Or, does gentoo simply
>>>>>> require a
>>>>>> smarter user than me, and I should go back to ubuntu?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the bottom line is that Gentoo needs to be updated more often
>>>>> than yearly. Others may also comment, but right now, I think a
>>>>> reinstall might be easier than working through all the problems,
>>>>> unless you are trying to learn more about how things work.
>>>>>
>>>>> My first question is why you have portage-9999 unmasked? I suggest
>>>>> going for the lowest version currently in the tree. I'm not sure if
>>>>> your first step should really be portage itself, or upgrading
>>>>> packages where the installed version is now masked due to security
>>>>> errors or being too out of date.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jack
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/14/20 23:36, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:10 PM n952162 <n952162@web.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/14/20 22:46, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:13 PM n952162 <n952162@web.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Action: sync for repo: gentoo, returned code = 0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * An update to portage is available. It is _highly_
>>>>>>>>>> recommended
>>>>>>>>>> * that you update portage now, before any other packages are
>>>>>>>>>> updated.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * To update portage, run 'emerge --oneshot portage' now.
>>>>>>>>> ...and? Did you update portage as it was _highly_ recommended
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> you do so first? What version of portage are you using? This
>>>>>>>>> appears
>>>>>>>>> on the top line of emerge --info.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> $ emerge --info
>>>>>>>> Portage 2.3.49 (python 3.6.5-final-0, default/linux/x86/17.0,
>>>>>>>> gcc-7.3.0,
>>>>>>>> glibc-2.26-r7, 4.14.65-gentoo x86_64)
>>>>>>> That version of portage has been removed from the repo for over a
>>>>>>> year.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would update your system so that is current and then try
>>>>>>> again. I
>>>>>>> believe that version of portage should still support EAPI 7 but
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> could be some other issue that is giving it problems with more
>>>>>>> recent
>>>>>>> packages in the tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-16 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 19:10 [gentoo-user] no ebuilds for telegram n952162
2020-05-14 19:23 ` Ashley Dixon
2020-05-14 19:28 ` Rich Freeman
2020-05-14 19:57 ` n952162
2020-05-14 20:08 ` Jack
2020-05-14 19:59 ` Matt Connell (Gmail)
2020-05-14 20:13 ` n952162
2020-05-14 20:19 ` Rich Freeman
2020-05-14 20:29 ` n952162
2020-05-14 21:03 ` Matt Connell (Gmail)
2020-05-14 21:08 ` n952162
2020-05-14 21:51 ` madscientistatlarge
2020-05-14 21:12 ` Ashley Dixon
2020-05-14 21:17 ` Matt Connell (Gmail)
2020-05-14 20:46 ` Rich Freeman
2020-05-14 21:10 ` n952162
2020-05-14 21:23 ` Dale
2020-05-14 21:36 ` Rich Freeman
2020-05-16 12:53 ` n952162
2020-05-16 14:19 ` Jack
2020-05-16 15:38 ` n952162
2020-05-16 15:56 ` n952162
2020-05-16 16:16 ` Jack
2020-05-16 16:23 ` n952162
2020-05-16 17:04 ` Jack [this message]
2020-05-16 17:32 ` Rich Freeman
2020-05-16 22:29 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de9d8bf6-54ec-9ce8-32e5-b4b70d9283f3@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox