From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-53907-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GeECK-0002Et-Rd
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:11:49 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9TH9ZYC002933;
Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:09:35 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9TH7T3I011982
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:07:30 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p46so2803973nfa
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:07:29 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=hDcGBDtjzuf/M4fN+Owx8kpin5QibPQbaYOyDGdy9VVWxZnQIe0e0NRcZMO1Ew2rYDcg65lYkugzzDmPiaSoeYJ83cvbvQKNFfALUrEDUGFZ0sUEr3guV8Um5SHqaakzAy8YauRZG7K37PgZ2O0QXVQcRFbBHgFd4TqGDqpN6pw=
Received: by 10.82.190.2 with SMTP id n2mr264506buf;
Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.82.177.12 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <dd0cef60610290907m7484ab91ucd4ce58a4fe6fe52@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:07:28 -0800
From: "Joshua Schmidlkofer" <joshland@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] BIG reiserfs problem
In-Reply-To: <4544D94E.8000807@comcast.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <d03887390610280316t38f83b1fi778dc46572d3a463@mail.gmail.com>
<4543DBBB.3090103@paradise.net.nz>
<dd0cef60610290756gfbd5b12x3c2060fcecb623d3@mail.gmail.com>
<200610291719.04472.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
<dd0cef60610290829h6003aa10u280c1906caa12682@mail.gmail.com>
<4544D94E.8000807@comcast.net>
X-Archives-Salt: 78147016-a201-460c-88d4-03160c9036fe
X-Archives-Hash: 62bf28af4de0a6d600b605a4c86f931b
Yeah, I will try JFS again some day. Not today, but someday. XFS
slow deletion is my personal pet peeve. I have been using XFS for so
long, so successfully, that I am hesitant to change. Plus, I have a
large number of existing installs.
Last year, I setup a JFS system on a dual-opteron. I have no idea
what went wrong, but binaries wouldn't load, shit would crash, sig 11,
etc, etc, etc. Finally, with now clue what was up, I reinstalled
using XFS. There are a number of significant differences. I am not
/blaming/ JFS, all I can say, it yet another JFS attempt went bad for
me.
So, XFS works, and I keep using it.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list