From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1051382C5 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88663E0CB5; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl0-x236.google.com (mail-pl0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 135F6E0AE1 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u11-v6so10406109plq.1 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:57:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BmjMNMA5674SZClzXBG5N570BphcmBv3YF0haZ5eedc=; b=FzA6sCmata6oIZSPSAyMGtzeBEk6JBVGVGn/XJy9Oe+O/izV9ug7TkS4wPn1/L7X7J kolGOVo5G40+AUl1UNUsdfxnEmxvKzhCyqc/WLnAmL6Qn00e6X6iIUVEnvvZMU2Q6Q2V vacTDWEqI6D2LqTwJCynqfUcgq56sGxondAakNOHCR8pwyF9gexoSn5cw8ndr3sq/iFk w+doSs9saVN78r11kfCf+qtpcbIDMF1XP23qmnFz0LEJCp7gnDQih9kD7MQS+fbNnqdd V8iRAkfxssFBv/BG39vkTSXP+4B5LB+FoXQJkLlI8+ipm3R8r+ZBxiqfaEXTR3sOstQn sZ4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BmjMNMA5674SZClzXBG5N570BphcmBv3YF0haZ5eedc=; b=IP03uguCIfThQKLebXAO96G9zzaTHa4mDTYfrFkkbu9Tmd/a5SP4dAEZqMyIOg3To9 iLaP6r/Ux5qJd9x0MgGqYXYRv1HvfU+5wO7wx1WT3Nh0Cu28drX1Hb+hS3IrzQHuO6bF FSl/ArV4cGET6YgDwKQGoqO8oVDZhC3aMuhnz9gbvgcx6zfGKIEOUqnWEoNtBogM/zG4 vrAhYfzKP2jFzB8CpeDvSPv7WS3nWjHc/mQdH1xWDMCbEK/cMJeQtW6svajrU1q0mecD XhqlX1bKMsXMlAxN1oK1HL/zHKvXYNE61ednkgHql0UzulADF3kcUGoeJGrcqMEqHojq tVOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7F338WcfakilU6adxBE2698fHkQeJcB4A32PTm3QZ8KSw6VGvXB 56u3fAQntuJbS/sI8fe5VZNRC/JN X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx494KsdmhnyosDyQ6op3LI17+hLz13JBGoPd32R+5ktrhnimdfImylaM4zecSbncOC2MSliZ9w== X-Received: by 10.99.125.87 with SMTP id m23mr9768395pgn.297.1522785445463; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:57:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.247.60] (d154-20-183-48.bchsia.telus.net. [154.20.183.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm7178393pfi.185.2018.04.03.12.57.24 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE update revdep-rebuild.sh fail To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <38b8323c-3e19-c9f2-6510-81da45ebb936@gmail.com> <1548742.7Vs5ckz6QP@ares-linux> From: Daniel Frey Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:57:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1548742.7Vs5ckz6QP@ares-linux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 52d752a8-278f-46c2-a36a-8f2897836ae9 X-Archives-Hash: 44a3d5a3e85edd120ce415a10db88d16 On 04/03/18 09:39, Elijah Mark Anderson wrote: > I'm pretty sure Nikos is correct. When running revdep-rebuild, you'll get the > following message that pretty much indicates the shell script version is being > retired: > > * This is the new python coded version > * Please report any bugs found using it. > * The original revdep-rebuild script is installed as revdep-rebuild.sh > * Please file bugs at: https://bugs.gentoo.org/ > > On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 11:29:21 AM CDT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> On 03/04/18 04:45, Daniel Frey wrote: >>> I updated my PC today, and there was a lot of KDE-related packages being >>> updated. >>> >>> As part of my usual update procedure I depclean'ed and ran >>> revdep-rebuild.sh - and it wants to rebuild every single package on my >>> system? Surely that has to be some kind of mistake? >>> >>> Anyone have any insight? >>> [...] >> >> I ran into this problem too. revdep-rebuild works fine though (note the >> lack of a ".sh" extension.) >> >> I think revdep-rebuild.sh is being retired in favor of revdep-rebuild, >> and sometimes the old version acts funny. Well, nuts. I wasn't using the new script because it always issued warnings and other crap and that drove me crazy. I guess I'll have to try the new script later. Dan