public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis <denis.che@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf?
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:53:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9a0a6da0705302053k315ff584n76e7c5aca266a00d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <982e82bf0705302016h1762dbeai491250d49a863b20@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/30/07, Ric de France <rdefrance@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think what is more useful is --prune (I'm guessing as I'm not in
> front of a Gentoo box at the moment). I usually try:
>
> # emerge -Pp

Here's the output:
________________________________________
myhost etc # emerge -Pp

>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:

 dev-java/java-config
    selected: 2.0.32
   protected: 1.3.7
     omitted: none

 sys-devel/automake
    selected: 1.10 1.6.3 1.7.9-r1
   protected: 1.9.6-r2
     omitted: none

 sys-devel/autoconf
    selected: 2.61
   protected: 2.13
     omitted: none

>>> 'Selected' packages are slated for removal.
>>> 'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed.
________________________________________

But doesn't --prune just remove all but the most recent installation
of a given package?

While on the subject, I ran a pretend on revdep-rebuild, and it's
complaining about some broken libraries in GCC...
________________________________________
langevin etc # revdep-rebuild -p -v
Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild

Environment mismatch from previous run, deleting temporary files...

Checking reverse dependencies...

Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update
will be emerged.

Collecting system binaries and libraries... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.1_files)

Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.2_ldpath)

Checking dynamic linking consistency...
  broken /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/libgcjawt.la (requires
/usr/lib/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.la)
  broken /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/libgij.la (requires
/usr/lib/libgcj.la)
 done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)

Assigning files to ebuilds... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds)

Evaluating package order... done.
  (/root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order)

All prepared. Starting rebuild...
emerge --oneshot -p -v =sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2  USE="fortran gcj gtk mudflap nls
(-altivec) -bootstrap -build -d -doc (-hardened) (-ip28) (-ip32r10k)
(-multilib) -multislot (-n32) (-n64) -nocxx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc
-test -vanilla" 0 kB

Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB
Now you can remove -p (or --pretend) from arguments and re-run revdep-rebuild.
________________________________________

I'm a little uneasy doing a --oneshot emerge of GCC when I just
recompiled my system twice...  I'm not sure how that will affect my
GCC upgrades in the future.  I only upgraded a minor version of GCC,
too.  Any thoughts?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-31  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-31  2:23 [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf? Denis
2007-05-31  2:43 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-05-31  3:16   ` Ric de France
2007-05-31  3:53     ` Denis [this message]
2007-05-31  4:00       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-31  4:25         ` Denis
2007-05-31  4:55           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-31 16:48         ` Denis
2007-06-01  3:30         ` Ric de France
2007-05-31  3:17   ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
     [not found] ` <20070606234438.GE2575@nibiru.local>
2007-06-07 15:54   ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-06-08 12:46     ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 13:18       ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 14:20         ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 14:51           ` Kent Fredric
     [not found]             ` <8cd1ed20706080754u276683f1h3a5136335aa3a971@mail.gmail.com>
2007-06-08 14:56               ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 18:37             ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09  6:44               ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-09 10:51                 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-06-12 12:59                 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09 10:46       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-06-12 13:49         ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 17:26           ` Kent Fredric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9a0a6da0705302053k315ff584n76e7c5aca266a00d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=denis.che@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox