From: Denis <denis.che@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf?
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:23:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9a0a6da0705301923g66681d19ib150d9a0bd5cdc1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all...
This is the output of "emerge --info" for the Gentoo box that I'm
still configuring - fresh install. I configured and compiled a
working version of the kernel, configured CFLAGS and USE flags, etc.
I also ran "emerge -eD system" and "emerge -eD world" and updated /etc
configs accordingly.
Now... Why are there multiple versions of java-config, autoconf, and
automake shown on my system? There could be other multi-version
packages... Is this normal for portage that is configured to
autoclean? If so, I find it rather interesting that packages would
depend on so many different versions of automake, for instance!
Portage 2.1.2.7 (default-linux/x86/2007.0, gcc-4.1.2, glibc-2.5-r3,
2.6.20-gentoo-r8 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.20-gentoo-r8 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU
6600 @ 2.40GHz
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.9
Timestamp of tree: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:50:01 +0000
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.32
dev-lang/python: 2.4.4-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.61
sys-devel/automake: 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10
sys-devel/binutils: 2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.16
sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.22
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.17-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=prescott -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-31 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 2:23 Denis [this message]
2007-05-31 2:43 ` [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf? Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-05-31 3:16 ` Ric de France
2007-05-31 3:53 ` Denis
2007-05-31 4:00 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-31 4:25 ` Denis
2007-05-31 4:55 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-05-31 16:48 ` Denis
2007-06-01 3:30 ` Ric de France
2007-05-31 3:17 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
[not found] ` <20070606234438.GE2575@nibiru.local>
2007-06-07 15:54 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-06-08 12:46 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 13:18 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 14:20 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 14:51 ` Kent Fredric
[not found] ` <8cd1ed20706080754u276683f1h3a5136335aa3a971@mail.gmail.com>
2007-06-08 14:56 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 18:37 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09 6:44 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-09 10:51 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-06-12 12:59 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09 10:46 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-06-12 13:49 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 17:26 ` Kent Fredric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9a0a6da0705301923g66681d19ib150d9a0bd5cdc1@mail.gmail.com \
--to=denis.che@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox