From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-64382-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HrGQA-00044o-3C
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 16:44:14 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4OGgxmY003300;
Thu, 24 May 2007 16:42:59 GMT
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4OGcOb7030268
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2007 16:38:24 GMT
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so81684ana
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=BTfIgWT2qputVWsAthBYY90XciZqCfrY2IZPzUgjoOr/KI0Mw8gxZgdyvRI5g9FR1bvGJgLBjzYxjiwLJpDR2PwAaKFV3/8Q39BbffXUYGYgMtRkVzB+YMpramq3VzkYsLnoksY3WnF++6AmU8RYL1bLGhBmFW8OW00bTQowl1o=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=ZP6mtARpfjP0EvqIxTGS7yWSkOrU5dS9DQCs77ygfOnmWJ9sedsIQyggZDNgHflrSyyT2WdoWV3wtj7c7Vqw9Namdf90xkSeojFB3MEhyE75DTgL5X/G0iLMwrJh8Tvrt4uIfpZv2i2AcMsRwx6P/amDk84JU9RpSITy+G5xnf4=
Received: by 10.114.93.17 with SMTP id q17mr988944wab.1180024699130;
Thu, 24 May 2007 09:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.72.10 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d9a0a6da0705240938y4bc79b28u28f85c037095e9a7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:38:19 -0400
From: Denis <denis.che@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf?
In-Reply-To: <20070524164310.46a03922@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <d9a0a6da0705240655p741ed606n8a7b3fc3fd7ce972@mail.gmail.com>
<642958cc0705240717s360e212er3f54e8636e5a06f1@mail.gmail.com>
<d9a0a6da0705240813j3e2121sf112e31f37437ceb@mail.gmail.com>
<20070524164310.46a03922@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
X-Archives-Salt: edb5333d-6c1f-4562-858f-ab3b7a640add
X-Archives-Hash: 7570c8c693e8ce9c1c702e0d0cea5a3e
On 5/24/07, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> Bear in mind that GCC is almost certainly masked for good reason. It's
> not like you're using a binary distro and only need a compiler for a few
> packages. Feel free to try it in the knowledge that if it breaks your
> system, you get to keep the pieces.
Ain't it the truth! No, I wasn't asking with the anxiety to hurry
things up - I was asking more about an estimated release time, whether
it will be a month, 2 months, 3 months, etc.
I'm not really looking to "experiment" with the cutting-edge releases
right now. My aim is to build a fast, stable system for my
computations, which ultimately brought me to another major decision:
32-bit or 64-bit... I run simulations which I write in C and
numerical computations which I run in Mathematica (which has just
released the 64-bit version). Would a 64-bit system significantly
benefit these applications?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list