From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HMcFA-00050Z-ER for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:46:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l213ixHU028456; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:44:59 GMT Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.188]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l213ee7I023570 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:40:40 GMT Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so363203mue for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:40:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=caqPs/OauzGFYSOLtgvleCyveznByJqi9DNfQX3fz6oa6qYyYw+P9ngOyqQ3TMj7E344QeCMi8FDKAhMJ5abIcoC+f4qLx4WZOPCqaO81rHrPyJN7vP7Si2Peu0NoNrJM/XUpWMUmzZu7HlqyOlnfxf/hEr8ub3sQ9ZL/lYKAqQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lRCFoXmy2WDTMBqJH63UDuc50CxTMjOmvwFFxRmaKp/0V3JZhY2ItmZ6UnEyo94Vyvy2jlWpcDa622blaFNWym8nmClV+1yOLssxPljrQQlhHu7CXNWCkL7KD/l+saPwwv9/+FD+5A/J95+KitZzFTYzigX4ijgnkz1kVW8FJHg= Received: by 10.82.120.14 with SMTP id s14mr482226buc.1172720439808; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.15 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:40:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:40:39 -0500 From: Denis To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] what causes "HAVE_CONFIG_H not found"? In-Reply-To: <45E63409.3010006@paradise.net.nz> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45E63409.3010006@paradise.net.nz> X-Archives-Salt: d6ddf5ed-ca7c-4cdd-bb1c-904e25b75380 X-Archives-Hash: cd74186c35a539c88e1e2b6bc7fd7552 > supposed to invoke gcc on that line? that 'CC=gcc mcc' construction is a > little odd..... looks like the Makefile is broken - have you chosen Boy this one was messy, but I figured it out. It turns out that there's another "mcc" compiler from MatLab, and it was installed on my system in /usr/bin. Mathematica's "mcc" compiler/linker, which I needed to use with the Monte Carlo integration package, was linked to my PATH also, but for some reason, the wrong "mcc" (from MatLab) was getting invoked first and thus messing up the compile process completely. I deleted the MatLab "mcc" from /usr/bin, and after that the make script worked like a charm and built all executables just like it was supposed to! Thanks for the help - looking into the makefile and then finding out and comparing the two mcc's and their respective command lines made me realize what's going on. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list