public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis <denis.che@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Mobo/proc combination
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:37:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9a0a6da0603130437s12794667jd850f8b58ce8b11d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603140118.33767.elinar@ihug.co.nz>

Iain,

So are you saying that a P4 is actually faster with HT disabled, or
simply that you don't have much to gain by using HT?  I've had a
dual-Xeon machine with 4 logical processors running Gentoo for a
couple years now, and I like being able to run 4 threads of
simulations at the same time.  The threads, when started nearly
simultaneously, seem to finish the same jobs in nearly the same amount
of time...  I've been told before that it's simply because the HT
makes both the actual processors less efficient...  Either way - I
haven't had any complaint about HT, but if there is conclusive
evidence that HT drastically takes away from true P4 power, then I'd
definitely like to know about it.

Thanks
Denis

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-13 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-13  4:23 [gentoo-user] Mobo/proc combination JimD
2006-03-13  5:05 ` Iain Buchanan
2006-03-13  6:59   ` JimD
2006-03-13  7:51     ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-13  8:12       ` Ash Varma
2006-03-13  8:47         ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-13 10:44           ` Glenn Enright
2006-03-13 11:53             ` Iain Buchanan
2006-03-13 12:18               ` Glenn Enright
2006-03-13 12:37                 ` Denis [this message]
2006-03-13 13:23                   ` Jerry McBride
2006-03-13 15:09                     ` Denis
2006-03-14  1:14                   ` Iain Buchanan
2006-03-13 17:50             ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-14  4:18             ` Walter Dnes
2006-03-14 11:28               ` Mike Williams
2006-03-13 11:50     ` Iain Buchanan
2006-03-13 11:11 ` Mike Williams
2006-03-13 13:04 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-03-13 18:22 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-03-13 18:31   ` Jim
2006-03-13 19:28     ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-13 20:10       ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-03-13 20:41         ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-13 21:09           ` Jim
2006-03-13 22:01             ` Mike Williams
2006-03-13 22:20               ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-13 22:06             ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-14  1:14               ` Jim
2006-03-14  3:59                 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-13 20:08     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9a0a6da0603130437s12794667jd850f8b58ce8b11d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=denis.che@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox