public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis <denis.che@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] hardware advice for dual-processor set-up on gentoo
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:01:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9a0a6da0509122101eebebf8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050912200733.3da4cc99@chi.speakeasy.net>

Bob, 

Thanks for that detailed write-up.  I don't pretend to have any
understanding of the architecture of the new dual-core Opterons, but I
did want to clarify a couple things...

I was under the impression that the Opterons didn't have the same type
of a NorthBridge bottleneck that Intel processors experience and were
thus quite a bit more efficient in the way they integrate with RAM and
themselves!...  In fact, from reading the numbers posted on the AMD
website comparing FSB and memory bandwidth, the numbers for the
Opteron were much superior to those for Intel.  Reading what you wrote
would make me think that the numbers AMD published were some kind of a
marketing ploy??

The numbers I am referring to are in this PDF:
http://multicore2.amd.com/Products/CompetitiveComparisons/2P_Server_Comparison.pdf

Also, I read on more than one occasion that the DDR2-400 and DDR2-533
suffer from latency issues and perform more sluggishly than their DDR1
counterparts as of right now......

I mean, out of most benchmarks I've read, it looked like an Opteron
comes out on top compared to the Irwindale Xeons (even with their 2MB
L2 cache) including floating-point arithmetic, only with the exception
of matrix multiplication...  Also, it appears that the dual-core
Opterons have true multithreading as opposed to Intel's seemingly
superficial Hyperthreading?

I've been using Intel-only products so far in my computer experiences,
and this is the first time I am considering buying a non-Intel system,
so I want to make sure I understand enough about both processors to
make an educated decision.

You mentioned compilers...  Do you HAVE to use those instead of the
standard GCC stuff?  I've never used anything but GCC before for
compiling things.

Thanks!

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-13  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-12 20:40 [gentoo-user] hardware advice for dual-processor set-up on gentoo Denis
2005-09-12 21:13 ` Mike Williams
2005-09-12 21:51 ` John Jolet
2005-09-12 23:23   ` Denis
2005-09-13  3:07 ` Bob Sanders
2005-09-13  4:01   ` Denis [this message]
2005-09-13  4:47     ` Denis
2005-09-15  1:03       ` Bob Sanders
2005-09-15 18:23       ` A. Khattri
2005-09-16  0:24     ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-16  0:54       ` Denis
2005-09-15 23:27   ` - -
2005-09-15 23:40     ` - -
2005-09-15 23:53     ` Bob Sanders

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9a0a6da0509122101eebebf8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=denis.che@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox