From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDHOM-0006Zs-4Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:45:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91B9AE07E6; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA9DE07E4 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so1701965wah.10 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:45:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=t4mJU3qeVT02OyAvx1uOfwB6/ouyLo/UCFsNR2b0hJc=; b=EoKCGj3492bv8sBOHnKoswB8yCF9LDrFzUU9ptupSGDx7OM8vj3+TN1aOqLyFZytvn1+eh3yilbWsaOv3Om6a7u5kwbnwauG7Fm+z79+vzEcrpBV6lPpS5Ys3L8sPm6Btnm6iYeKqV8nLA1SIgkC1Vk0hevsnfc3T+Zvk0G5bPk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PJnBQ88cus9w52f50Y1g4jfcfYRp8aDpUI7ZDbI9ofKSfO31k8iJ/fDf1EoOZzxEBzJhGh2fKwlAxV0bu3OhS6e3d1oaI6e5/2PNe8bR8dUgRC/nvZwMtFNt35eXkwFFawXmI7Khu95J6WwvYaGx7xL2XWtmshbx/osw/QtmiOU= Received: by 10.114.111.1 with SMTP id j1mr3497429wac.138.1200048309362; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:45:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.46.9 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:45:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:45:09 +0100 From: Galevsky To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead? In-Reply-To: <200801111219.47254.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <200801111038.08071.dirk.heinrichs.ext@nsn.com> <200801111219.47254.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 13718be4-8f99-4bac-a6de-1ece22e46126 X-Archives-Hash: de4503a193dc7495ebcf6c14108621f5 On Jan 11, 2008 11:19 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Friday 11 January 2008, Galevsky wrote: > > You can say that devs have no time to make it, but please, don't tell > > that Gentoo doesn't need any installCD (outdated means no CD at all > > for many computers nowaday). > > Please tell me where I said any such thing. As I said, outdated means no CD at all for many computers nowaday. And I tought you told us that the current Gentoo installCD has no need to be upgraded. > I'll give you a clue - I didn't. I asked you why you think the install > CD needs updated. I misunderstood your question... > Apparently your answer to that is that you have a ICH9 machine. That's > fine, it's reasonable to need that supported on the BootCD. Was it > really necessary to take out your frustrations/whatever with the > installer on me on a public mailing list? Hmmm? Sorry if I were rude with you Alan, it was not my intentions, plus I mixed up you question with the affirmation "no need to update". Gal' -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list