From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-72185-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1IxjyH-0000eS-9W
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:02:29 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lATDxtwN006159;
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:59:55 GMT
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lATDsxW7032477
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:55:00 GMT
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so2261603wah
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:54:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=Bz6lLYbpdYcMfpFK2A9QF7C7qV21td/2F53zxTEZJ8A=;
b=h95tbApdrl74NKXX8XV8r09CgeEZoyWoU92g1f1q/wfNFQeJBPvlLqzxaf3Vp8MkunrgOGt2m2Esul6yx75BTamSIUJk7dNwWwd3TtIbinAsxI7XR5OkWQaZpRuasg5fkL0JCkFE4CaSuB5DNNKYKQ4lN9x6X6CPLV4QRBMigQE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=m5JZDlpPAb8uEQWyZEIdFdFK4u//g+56xFr0go3wILkhHd8qa3Ne6ojBtkq7swqwJBo/ZYUQ3DdcKdORdcrP59nqzzSJwKyTOtBXpwh65jlmrP02DA1STtzq8cn5RouhDj8Y+/lezRAv8PiCEuQJ/CzfArk16ugaBOr3s0fx+8s=
Received: by 10.115.111.1 with SMTP id o1mr336441wam.1196344498869;
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:54:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.46.9 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:54:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <d5cfc3af0711290554i7baa42c1g6131a5b2bfd115e7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:54:58 +0100
From: Galevsky <galevsky@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo on the server side
In-Reply-To: <a964044f0711290510t76492382p3106f0c2101dc303@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <a964044f0711281001p78321147p3af1a4b251635a29@mail.gmail.com>
<642958cc0711281345j48779db4v59cc0a60050512f3@mail.gmail.com>
<474DE646.50708@robertspahr.com> <474E48D2.8060606@gonoph.net>
<a964044f0711290510t76492382p3106f0c2101dc303@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 5f3f25b9-2ee8-41ed-8acd-abedf2fc41ac
X-Archives-Hash: ad5ceb5829cfabe1d252232c146e47c1
It mainly depends on your own feelings. I think that a debian stable
is a very good choice for a prod' server, but I really dislike the way
Debian manages daemon and prefer the Gentoo approach. Updates are not
painless...for sure, but you have to consider your needs first (what
tools do you need ? typical web services ? extra lib from different
languages ? any time reserved for maintenance or the server cannot be
off ?). Then, updating is not a must. Believe me, an up-to-date
machine is nice .... when you want brand new lib/features/softwares.
Do your server need to be so.. up-to-date ?
Finally, if you take time to estimate what should be updated prior to
emerge the whole world, you can plan your updates and organize the way
to go back if required.... and updates are not nightmares. (But have a
look at the handbook:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=2). You
also need tools like dispatch-conf to undo easily your conf files
changes.
Gal'
On Nov 29, 2007 2:10 PM, Rafael Barrera Oro <borafael@gmail.com> wrote:
> First of all, thanks to everybody for sharing your experiences, very
> helpful information indeed, specially now that i need some guidance.
> For now, the conclusion i can reach is that Gentoo is perfectly adequate
> to use on a server with the only downside of the need to have special care
> with updates.
> Ricardo, i find really encouraging the fact that your lab uses Gentoo for
> their servers. Nevertheless it would be great if you could tell us a little
> about your lab's experience with updates, which seems to be the only issue
> when using Gentoo on a server.
> Another thing i noticed is that some of you recommend to have a secondary
> server to perform tests, i totally agree with this. Unfortunately i do not
> think that having such thing will be possible since the server will be
> charged to a client and i do not think they will agree to buy a second
> server (even if its the right thing to do, which i believe so), in such
> case, would you still recommend Gentoo?.
>
> Again, thanks to everybody for the information.
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list