From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Ruby - 3 versions - seriously????
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 07:54:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d2is7e-bqg.ln1@graaff.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7b8d7e5b-51d5-2bc2-e1be-e4c9e5510bda@wht.com.au
On Sat, 02 Sep 2017 21:33:31 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm in the process of doing a world update and due to a failed
compile,
> I have cause to look up through the list of stuff to compile/update.
> Imagine my surprise when I saw there were three versions of Ruby wanting
> to update:
>
> [ebuild U ] dev-lang/ruby-2.4.1-r4 [2.4.1-r3]
> [ebuild U ] dev-lang/ruby-2.3.4-r4 [2.3.4-r3]
> [ebuild U ] dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r4 [2.2.7-r3]
That is unusual unless you configured this yourself. Did you set
RUBY_TARGETS in make.conf? Are you on stable or testing?
It would also be interesting to know what is pulling in these ruby
versions.
> I would prefer to get rid of Ruby, but, if memory serves me
correctly,
> someone associated with the kernel decided it would be a good idea to
> use yet another language for something, obviously Python wasn't good
> enough....
webkit-gtk and thin-provisioning-tools come to mind as pulling ruby for
people that don't want it perse.
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-03 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-02 13:33 [gentoo-user] Ruby - 3 versions - seriously???? Andrew Lowe
2017-09-02 13:57 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-09-02 20:57 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-09-02 21:37 ` Marvin Gülker
2017-09-03 2:18 ` R0b0t1
2017-09-03 10:31 ` Marvin Gülker
2017-09-03 20:35 ` R0b0t1
2017-09-04 6:49 ` Marvin Gülker
2017-09-04 17:07 ` R0b0t1
2017-09-04 17:49 ` Michael Orlitzky
2017-09-04 21:15 ` R0b0t1
2017-09-04 20:32 ` Marvin Gülker
2017-09-04 23:40 ` R0b0t1
2017-09-05 12:46 ` konsolebox
2017-09-03 6:08 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans de Graaff
2017-09-03 5:54 ` Hans de Graaff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d2is7e-bqg.ln1@graaff.xs4all.nl \
--to=graaff@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox