From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-53791-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GdlJF-00008Y-Ew
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:21:01 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9SAInj0025444;
Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:18:49 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9SAGoI1014422
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:16:50 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF77264951
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:16:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.412 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.187,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AkkDO4R6YL0g for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:16:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABED64A2B
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id h2so892255ugf
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=APx97IpoxEzvhsLHksQuyOyc2vuqYaNXPOxiVIm93mfDz5t1nkgfALX8KMNt1fCjwEsOkYfLlQa4qua38zl4wC37QBcXB9IPJ/mmS3k2u9KnTGRWfPrrcjM9DbgRGLrcu5EkEDJYEL5xY/BmDo1/TV5kUY02z5YJlBB1xUu4Jx4=
Received: by 10.67.101.8 with SMTP id d8mr992112ugm;
Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.221.1 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d03887390610280316t38f83b1fi778dc46572d3a463@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:16:38 +0000
From: CapSel <capsel@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] BIG reiserfs problem
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Archives-Salt: 0bf4576a-ed66-43f6-b238-57b0a28eda9d
X-Archives-Hash: 5f3c624798ac3580ade0a195cd2ea3fe
It's now more than five times when reiserfs has "sucked my data into
/dev/null". At the begining I thout that was a hardware problem -
disk, ram... but now I am almost 100% sure that reiserfs IS NOT stable
file system. It doesn't matter if I have gentoo-sources or
hardened-sources, if I compile for my arch or for i386... heavy load
or just one rsync process, gentoo or slackware (I thought that I gave
"bad" CFLAGS, USE...).
...it lacked support for SEcurity labels some time ago...
But it is still fastest fs.
Am I the only one who have this problem?
So my question is - how can I help to eliminate this bug(s)?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list