From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21BE5138350 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C636E0921; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A6CEE0909 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [81.157.200.200] (helo=[192.168.1.225]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1jNMFZ-0007MA-C5 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:57:10 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Alternate Incoming Mail Server To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20200406123504.fkcuaiiahsemympv@ad-gentoo-main> <20200406211758.4hbhn62guek55hnt@ad-gentoo-main> <3290988.V25eIC5XRa@eve> <20200407105316.xsxov5shllxwhv45@ad-gentoo-main> From: antlists Message-ID: Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:57:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200407105316.xsxov5shllxwhv45@ad-gentoo-main> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 417b50c1-849d-437b-addd-682c0de51560 X-Archives-Hash: a1a2656994b7f420241927ae51804e42 On 07/04/2020 11:53, Ashley Dixon wrote: > Grant's mail server, I assume, is configured with the highest security in mind, > so I can see how a mail server with a dynamic I.P.\ could cause issues in some > contexts. I just wish my I.S.P.\ offered_any_ sort of static I.P.\ package, but > given that I live in remote area in the north of England, I.S.P.s aren't exactly > plentiful. https://www.aa.net.uk/ Andrews and Arnold. From what I know of them, a fair few people who know what they're talking about say they're good. Sounds they're like what Demon were before Clueless and Witless took them over. Cheers, Wol