From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-86668-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1L3ZDE-0003Zc-2G
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:50:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99D3AE0375;
	Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:50:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.240])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53027E0375
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:50:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so1131988rvf.46
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:50:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=ucCBfR8U+R8wPw1cwhba39tUlN3rYUKzAohSr8f2HIQ=;
        b=Dm+W/Lx41niebRWJPSyoSd+uYZD3rOvRGRNyOhzI6WJlhwYcOziLVft4ReEGiVIolu
         j3NzuOmSSlfERJLaQ8d4PJpVzh0OJNvlBK23tmLL3YTL3RrqDRo14U7HzI5n5LUeFF81
         pZ9YOLsHCvvMLAeSUVoSvordUenMzbA3UeiDA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=XgUg3yoqVDY+LcHdX24guAONaDVHLyHHSpnqBdt6d9+hrJBRENI86qJ2GX78qEBegB
         ruwyE64LV4yXgbEQEU8AiksHmq7h/ivjFQUxwH+3AfMDEj4YlkwHPyjqnirMFsavMbtk
         tMOhB0Yn2OHn+eniKEbPSOph3OvIMXX0xOEI0=
Received: by 10.140.141.16 with SMTP id o16mr394559rvd.138.1227286228219;
        Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.193.12 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ccf48b120811210850l4f40b493n9b94c0d9ddff4820@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:50:28 -0500
From: "Chris Thomas" <sruchris@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Deny flash to a specific user?
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0811210834t2aeea7f9s5c13ecf7e5b8e294@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <5bdc1c8b0811181729v5e92cc0fh701faab1b02bd869@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1227067612.16932.5.camel@blackwidow.nbk>
	 <28C5CD56-5A44-4F6A-85CC-C28CC2C2F0A3@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
	 <c3d5f3800811190205o4449688ev298bdb2725888cfc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20081119150757.GD7022@beastie.linwin>
	 <20081121162218.GA19595@mirja.bruns>
	 <5bdc1c8b0811210834t2aeea7f9s5c13ecf7e5b8e294@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 52b16ad2-d830-4bda-b441-752b028284d7
X-Archives-Hash: 99172a0b84002a83d978a02464808f5e

Squid with squidguard or dansguardian should filter out most of the 'bad stuff'.

-Chris

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:22 AM,  <emailjp79@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Michael [19.Nov.2008 16:07]:
>>
>>> On 10:05 Wed 19 Nov     , Qian Qiao wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> In that case, isn't putting
>>>>
>>>> 127.0.0.1 ADDRESSES_TO_BE_BLOCKED
>>>>
>>>> into /etc/hosts easier?
>>>>
>>>> Or just set up a proxy.
>>>
>>> No, perhaps not, considering the fact that there are so many sites with
>>> pron. Maintaining such a massive hosts file is a disaster and worse still
>>> the solution is not fullproof. But then, FWIW such problems seldom have
>>> foolproof solutions.
>>
>> Well, at least there is "mvps" [1] with a nice host-file, blocking
>> mostly ads, banners etc., which I use myself without much trouble.
>> While searching for a list of porn-sites to add to that list, I stumbled
>> upon BadHosts [2], which includes several hosts-files, one of them
>> entirely for porn-sites.
>>
>> The sites listed there might get you started, but as noted by Qian Qiao
>> before, that list will never be complete or up-to-date. Besides, using
>> an anonymizer to reach one of those sites will get you there anyway. You
>> would have to block those, too.
>>
>> My opinion: If children are to be "protected" from that kind of content,
>> seting up a public computer in a livingroom might be a better way (in
>> conjunction with a host-file maybe for those nasty ads). But as soon as
>> one starts blocking sites, the question will be where to stop.
>>
>>
>> JP
>
> Thanks to all that have answered. I appreciate the responses greatly.
>
> Indeed the question was based around what to do with a kid that's not
> using his computer time appropriately. It has nothing to do with
> 'protecting' him via censoring or anything like that. It was more a
> matter of should he be playing Flash games or playing online videos of
> Star Craft games when he has homework to be doing. After thinking
> about it the decision in the end was to do nothing technical. Nothing
> technical is going to fix this problem other than him growing up a
> bit.
>
> Thanks again,
> Mark
>
>