From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3B31382C5 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C23B8E0829; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail125c7.megamailservers.com (mail765.megamailservers.com [69.49.98.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6905CE07A5 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:22:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: admin@sys-concept.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.com; s=mailtor; t=1622564549; bh=+7ZmQYatSqQq8JqdfGQ9nq1S2lwIPe3/RLyj4mF9bX8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GhszWx1ILt4FkyPaOpQzyjRHLnzgWlajk0UWz+b7rIbbDWn0llRtCPuiEHJRPBm75 YQ+WjsY2BxqMpyIfy5OAB+OoYEx1M4O6LX84b7hq5fbRtOpaXGExqOxi/WughiWf2k M0bjlZFrDHvF2mZldGdtPyl9WhH51ZSIn1tbFZrk= Feedback-ID:thelma@sys-conc X-VIP: 69.49.109.100 Received: from [10.0.0.109] 184.69.242.18":"52884 ([184.69.242.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail125c7.megamailservers.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 151GMR6C007073 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:22:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is "scp" reliable? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <1eee5cf4-9234-07cf-4b83-7de431483d51@sys-concept.com> From: thelma@sys-concept.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:22:26 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F20.60B65EC4.006C:SCFSTAT54230205,ss=1,re=-4.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: -4.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=Y62GTSWN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=u3gW5Uk2xAGXuEgp5FffjQ==:117 a=u3gW5Uk2xAGXuEgp5FffjQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=4lxH4IQtjJ5v4UzXBpAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdelhedguddtudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpvedtjeenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpehthhgvlhhmrgesshihshdqtghonhgtvghpthdrtghomhenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffkeeuffelvddvveefhffgffekuddvheefheetkefgudejhefgkeehffehkedttdenucfkphepudekgedrieelrddvgedvrddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedukeegrdeiledrvdegvddrudekpdhhvghloheplgdutddrtddrtddruddtlegnpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhvghlmhgrsehshihsqdgtohhntggvphhtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghgvnhhtohhoqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdrghgvnhhtohhordhorhhg X-Origin-Country: CA X-Archives-Salt: 63668bf6-e7d5-4870-bff7-566ffd086a07 X-Archives-Hash: c97ee16833373413959308e26ba85c6a On 6/1/21 9:57 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2021-05-29, Mark Knecht wrote: > >> Different revisions of md5sum possibly? > > No, not unless md5sum is seriosly and fatally broken. > > MD5 is MD5. > > The entire point of a hash algorithm is that it's precisely and > completely defined and the answer never varies from one implementation > to another. It was a problem with memory module, I did not run memory test after assembling the PC (should have), so the Gentoo install OK, transferring standard (small files) md5sum check OK; but on larger files eg. 28GB scp, rysnc, md5sum all fail. Running memory test give me nothing but errors, swapping the memory stick from a good PC solved the problem.