From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-173980-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 752451395E2
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 08:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B6C021C07B;
Tue, 8 Nov 2016 08:49:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com (mail-pf0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1A0E0A6C
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 08:49:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id d2so104374652pfd.0
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:49:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to;
bh=MlzW9SBMMv1U/6JXoM29cFhGgGpnBKYaQpl+GkkF7c8=;
b=DY3RKUVoXtdrd2qNWdRSB0T7xFWvDE2Kt/DhCuyc4fo8rTe0iGlU2jDdR/Qk/SmL6l
wVGt8fG0t0rfRP/wCodyQCvJX35pB1/QpCIgPvIch7BOmc18ZMGFuM1zabB1nk9QLbLk
z53dI37Y8TsFEp7CLtHgAvtRKo2SrT2TST8dKHaX9btb+pFNFoSlqQEjDOBaaoUfVbzd
zlXqM1fidQm5PFvBkwVdbNvr4NnOy9ygeow5sKhVm47lBwW6W79pur+9LHhySvSEtgnh
dgGS6kJRjr7wRmlohSJTlnQbfcbwLKKMdEm+v+13+3E6Edni4pfftyco1gOxsiZLfT1H
+ZSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to;
bh=MlzW9SBMMv1U/6JXoM29cFhGgGpnBKYaQpl+GkkF7c8=;
b=gXtGDkyVA2dIDFNIcfMEH9ZZih11W7O0eLFqqvRsFpBpgK9YcIPCdt/lgbxLTgljP2
lwHLfZt5xf1Sf+zkkEqbaZb4Cw986uljy+9aBZqQJFnTTzC7D0JEIOx5tlmb38axaDo6
JRKmtmjWjGH/cHLQzKZGduWPsa7BvymAObjOhJI/02Z1WnjRAWCh2XztV+heKS6KHgja
Qg4L5oDgP2LNK8OQU0UKBg9XaTMVGEQCgwe6Y2ch3BnLfO3vulX64+iV0bq9iZKpB4sK
l5b2qyg+PeCBJ4bPQNg9Pm3+9pZNxYShQVKZKXJlqFpCPPrYT43mL9jpF2uR5+0Yw9QG
tmnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvch6GThK6OBcU0aM8eDpItFvTl0Cf9nlkiWQPHBQLeebtTuA/RqROoZB9zxtRTQ4Q==
X-Received: by 10.99.251.5 with SMTP id o5mr5089488pgh.160.1478594613198;
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:43:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.11] (nv-71-49-171-205.dhcp.embarqhsd.net. [71.49.171.205])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fm6sm46302652pab.37.2016.11.08.00.43.31
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dynamic IP address services.
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <8D575227-683B-40C4-9739-DD79F2BCB7AC@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
<602a9ede-2cea-a263-5707-79df18cdefd1@gmail.com>
<20161107171349.6150.33DF1A20@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
<87pom6g0s6.fsf@reader.local.lan>
From: Willie M <matthews.willie80@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c886ca38-61fe-abd6-0a0f-2bd63c882d71@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 00:43:30 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.3.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87pom6g0s6.fsf@reader.local.lan>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="5dPv9ELhlfWSOOb7mOtlId8dUhGGKOkH3"
X-Archives-Salt: 16822fc9-ae5c-478f-a69b-32db602d020d
X-Archives-Hash: 5be1b3d60fddb62603656e02c494b655
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--5dPv9ELhlfWSOOb7mOtlId8dUhGGKOkH3
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="QFLpOT9lbF0lfW3kmPmeXNgfwmVKHoxon"
From: Willie M <matthews.willie80@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <c886ca38-61fe-abd6-0a0f-2bd63c882d71@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dynamic IP address services.
References: <8D575227-683B-40C4-9739-DD79F2BCB7AC@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
<602a9ede-2cea-a263-5707-79df18cdefd1@gmail.com>
<20161107171349.6150.33DF1A20@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
<87pom6g0s6.fsf@reader.local.lan>
In-Reply-To: <87pom6g0s6.fsf@reader.local.lan>
--QFLpOT9lbF0lfW3kmPmeXNgfwmVKHoxon
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 11/07/2016 06:31 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Ian Zimmerman <itz@primate.net> writes:
>=20
>> On 2016-11-06 22:54, Willie M wrote:
>>
>>> http://freedns.afraid.org/
>>
>> ++ ++
>>
>> I had used both Dyn and NoIP before, but they both went all Web 2.0 on=
>> me (and other well known ones probably did the same).
>>
>> FreeDNS is just perfect for me - a blast of fresh air from the past :-=
)
>=20
> Just the tiniest bit thin on explaining what the heck you are expected
> to do on the various pages that appear when setting up an account.
>=20
> I'd like to have a real ip for a change... been doing the fake home
> lan thing for years and always there are problems with sendmail or
> other mail apps. Either masquerading or some other work around.
>=20
> Can anyone tell me if the freedns place will supply me with an ip that
> will work for sendmail? Will stand up across the internet when other
> internet hosts do reverse dns on my address for mail purposes.
>=20
> They advertise static addresses too, is there any draw back to that?
>=20
>=20
Hey Harry,
If I a not mistaken if you change your nameservers to FreeDNS you will
be able to have that dynamic IP Address that way. So your reverse lookup
should work just fine.
Only problem is that if your IP address changes, you would have a short
amount of time that your server would not respond (because of the IP
change). The default TTL on FreeDNS is 3600 seconds (1 hour).
Reading on the front page it says that you can edit the TTL if you add
your own domain. I don't know for sure how it all works because I have
never added on. It doesn't hurt to try and it seems like it would be a
lot better than what you are using now.
Hope this helps.
--=20
Willie Matthews
matthews.willie80@gmail.com
--QFLpOT9lbF0lfW3kmPmeXNgfwmVKHoxon--
--5dPv9ELhlfWSOOb7mOtlId8dUhGGKOkH3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYIZAyAAoJEORWkAOdMBvZvDwH/1qZWPynmK/VNIOdCwgpMUEq
wu/jRjD2YNVfEiipnPn9Vr0Vv3VnMIr9R2DF+MWr4bpsllH5GfFUhJ4mKri5jnX4
kifd7ej4kcoRtyNFLLeqEue2X/3qtTpoeU+tUmniy2ROrWGatiK80peIpbOTakr3
NzsUt+KNCMadd6ab9ealqyNZFg3iltM+8MxUdpvbXHIZqqjY5Y15ggNcHsbHF0y4
6Er0YKXP/dv+wWTTd8Tzn1imet50bZRjnr4hKF703LJRG4TrRyWI0TsKxwHO7OhX
Yh3NB6J9hRxK+RXGt39DLvYbZoN7jUWXiRGI5qek09ty+5Vmmtzdr849NkQemKA=
=EqsY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5dPv9ELhlfWSOOb7mOtlId8dUhGGKOkH3--