[gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

Hi all,

I sought how to make pass my emerge's starting from a tunnel configured with
Putty but did not find nothing  interesting.
How can i do this ?

Thx ;)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 187 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Alan McKinnon]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I sought how to make pass my emerge's starting from a tunnel
> configured with Putty but did not find nothing  interesting.
> How can i do this ?
>
> Thx ;)

Are you using putty on windows then?

Log in with putty, you will get a bash session. Become root, run emerge.


If this doesn't work, then post back with FULL error messages, the 
process you followed and where it failed.

alan


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 936 bytes --]

2008/1/14, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>:
>
> On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I sought how to make pass my emerge's starting from a tunnel
> > configured with Putty but did not find nothing  interesting.
> > How can i do this ?
> >
> > Thx ;)
>
> Are you using putty on windows then?
>
> Log in with putty, you will get a bash session. Become root, run emerge.
>
>
> If this doesn't work, then post back with FULL error messages, the
> process you followed and where it failed.
>
> alan
>
>
> --
> Alan McKinnon
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
> --
> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Thx for the Answer but  I think I asked the question wrong. I Use Putty to
bypass a HTTP proxy who do not let emerge Work.
So i wan't to run portage in my pc, not in the remote one. But i wan't to
sync passing the SSH tunnel who is configurated to listen at the port 8080
of my localhost.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1336 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:

> Thx for the Answer but  I think I asked the question wrong. I Use
> Putty to bypass a HTTP proxy who do not let emerge Work.
> So i wan't to run portage in my pc, not in the remote one. But i wan't
> to sync passing the SSH tunnel who is configurated to listen at the
> port 8080 of my localhost.

It's not clear at all whether you have http access from your gentoo box. 
If so, did you try emerge-webrsync?
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1102 bytes --]

>
>
> It's not clear at all whether you have http access from your gentoo box.
> If so, did you try emerge-webrsync?
> --
> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



# emerge --sync
>>> Starting rsync with rsync://140.211.166.165/gentoo-portage...
>>> Checking server timestamp ...
timed out
rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(276)
[receiver=2.6.9]
>>> Retrying...


# emerge-webrsync -v
Fetching most recent snapshot
Attempting to fetch file dated: 20080113
--12:48:20--
http://mirror.hamakor.org.il/pub/mirrors/gentoo//snapshots/portage-20080113.tar.bz2
           => `/var/tmp/emerge-webrsync/portage-20080113.tar.bz2'
Résolution de mirror.hamakor.org.il... 82.80.248.176
Connexion vers mirror.hamakor.org.il|82.80.248.176|:80...connecté.
requête HTTP transmise, en attente de la réponse...ERREUR de lecture
(Connexion terminée par expiration du délai d'attente) de l'en-tête.
Nouvel essai.

It's in french but easy to understand.... My tunnel works, i use IRC
throught it, but i don't know where to configure Portage to use it.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1619 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:

> It's in french but easy to understand.... My tunnel works, i use IRC
> throught it, but i don't know where to configure Portage to use it.

Do you also use http through it?

Regarding portage, it could be as easy as doing

# export http_proxy="name.of.your.proxy"

but without further info about your config (meaning: exact putty config, 
and exact use you make of it, and from where), it's difficult to help.
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 986 bytes --]

2008/1/14, Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org>:
>
> On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
>
> > It's in french but easy to understand.... My tunnel works, i use IRC
> > throught it, but i don't know where to configure Portage to use it.
>
> Do you also use http through it?
>
> Regarding portage, it could be as easy as doing
>
> # export http_proxy="name.of.your.proxy"
>
> but without further info about your config (meaning: exact putty config,
> and exact use you make of it, and from where), it's difficult to help.
> --
> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
> Ok, ;)

My Network have a Squid Proxy who allow only some ports like 80 443...

Putty is configurated to connect to a box i have in an other place, it allow
to make a SSH Tunnel who create a socks proxy at localhost:8080. Putty
listen to this port and send all the frames passing the 443 of the SQUID
proxy to my exterior box. I wan't to configure Portage to use this SOCK
proxy at localhost:8080

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1351 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 36 bytes --]

What other information can i give ?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 40 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:

> Ok, ;)
>
> My Network have a Squid Proxy who allow only some ports like 80 443...

Ok, so you should be able to use 

# export http_proxy="proxyname or address"
# emerge-webrsync

To use the already existing proxy in your network. If you insist on using 
your tunnel, read on.

> Putty is configurated to connect to a box i have in an other place, it
> allow to make a SSH Tunnel who create a socks proxy at localhost:8080.

So you're forwarding port 8080 on the putty (windows) box to port 1080 on 
the remote box, where a SOCKS server is listening on that port, correct?

I'm not sure whether putty allows non-local connections to forwarded 
ports by default, if this is not the case you'll need to enable that 
option.

> Putty listen to this port and send all the frames passing the 443 of
> the SQUID proxy to my exterior box.

How do you do that?

> I wan't to configure Portage to 
> use this SOCK proxy at localhost:8080

"localhost", IIUC, is a windows box, and portage is running on another 
(linux, on the same network) box. So, at a minimum, you'll need to 
use "a.b.c.d:8080" as a SOCKS server, where a.b.c.s is the IP address of 
the windows putty box.

Assuming you have a SOCKS server at "a.b.c.d:8080" (albeit through a 
tunnel, but the apps don't know that), then you need to use some 
socksifying utility for emerge, since (AFAIK) it does not support SOCKS 
out of the box. So, something like

# socksify emerge --sync

should work (though I have not tested it). socksify is part of 
net-proxy/dante. Of course, you need to specify the SOCKS proxy at 
a.b.c.d port 8080 in the /etc/socks/socks.conf configuration file (I 
don't remember the exact syntax to do that right now, but it should be 
quite intuitive).
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2183 bytes --]

2008/1/14, Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org>:
>
> On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
>
> > Ok, ;)
> >
> > My Network have a Squid Proxy who allow only some ports like 80 443...
>
> Ok, so you should be able to use
>
> # export http_proxy="proxyname or address"
> # emerge-webrsync
>
> To use the already existing proxy in your network. If you insist on using
> your tunnel, read on.
>
> > Putty is configurated to connect to a box i have in an other place, it
> > allow to make a SSH Tunnel who create a socks proxy at localhost:8080.
>
> So you're forwarding port 8080 on the putty (windows) box to port 1080 on
> the remote box, where a SOCKS server is listening on that port, correct?
>
> I'm not sure whether putty allows non-local connections to forwarded
> ports by default, if this is not the case you'll need to enable that
> option.
>
> > Putty listen to this port and send all the frames passing the 443 of
> > the SQUID proxy to my exterior box.
>
> How do you do that?
>
> > I wan't to configure Portage to
> > use this SOCK proxy at localhost:8080
>
> "localhost", IIUC, is a windows box, and portage is running on another
> (linux, on the same network) box. So, at a minimum, you'll need to
> use "a.b.c.d:8080" as a SOCKS server, where a.b.c.s is the IP address of
> the windows putty box.
>
> Assuming you have a SOCKS server at "a.b.c.d:8080" (albeit through a
> tunnel, but the apps don't know that), then you need to use some
> socksifying utility for emerge, since (AFAIK) it does not support SOCKS
> out of the box. So, something like
>
> # socksify emerge --sync
>
> should work (though I have not tested it). socksify is part of
> net-proxy/dante. Of course, you need to specify the SOCKS proxy at
> a.b.c.d port 8080 in the /etc/socks/socks.conf configuration file (I
> don't remember the exact syntax to do that right now, but it should be
> quite intuitive).
> --
> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



I am a little confused...

Putty listen to my 127.0.0.1:8080 and forward to my extern box:443 passing
the squid proxy:3128 (in SSH of course)

I tried configure the http proxy by export... but the web rsync still don't
run...

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2738 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:

> I am a little confused...
>
> Putty listen to my 127.0.0.1:8080 and forward to my extern box:443
> passing the squid proxy:3128 (in SSH of course)

What application is running on the remote box, port 443? A SOCKS server 
or something else?

What kind of machine is "127.0.0.1:8080", where putty is running? It's 
likely a windows box, but now putty exists for linux too. 
Is this the same machine you want to run portage on? If not, is the 
portage box on the same network as the putty one?

> I tried configure the http proxy by export... but the web rsync still
> don't run...

Exactly what command did you enter and how the error messages looked like 
(the exact messages)?
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 807 bytes --]

2008/1/14, Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org>:
>
>
> What application is running on the remote box, port 443? A SOCKS server
> or something else?


OpenSSH,  which  manage the redirections  alone.

What kind of machine is "127.0.0.1:8080", where putty is running? It's
> likely a windows box, but now putty exists for linux too.
> Is this the same machine you want to run portage on? If not, is the
> portage box on the same network as the putty one?



I am on Linux :P and the configuration  is my Gentoo  Installation.
127.O.O.1 is my machine where putty is running, Xchat run with this proxy
configuration: Socks5 127.0.0.1:8080

After Many tests, this solution worked. Thx for that ;)

But I am interested on a global configuration who pass all connection by the
SSH tunnel.

How i can do that ?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1378 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Alan McKinnon]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
>> What kind of machine is "127.0.0.1:8080", where putty is running?
>> It's likely a windows box, but now putty exists for linux too.
>> Is this the same machine you want to run portage on? If not, is the
>> portage box on the same network as the putty one?
>
>
> I am on Linux

Now I am confused. Why do you run Putty on a Linux machine?

I used it once just to confuse and confound co-workers and have it 
runable in Wine just to impress some other people.

But I'd never seriously USE it for anything...  That's why I have ... 
um ... openssh and ... err ... telnet

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 900 bytes --]

2008/1/14, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>:
>
> On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
> >> What kind of machine is "127.0.0.1:8080", where putty is running?
> >> It's likely a windows box, but now putty exists for linux too.
> >> Is this the same machine you want to run portage on? If not, is the
> >> portage box on the same network as the putty one?
> >
> >
> > I am on Linux
>
> Now I am confused. Why do you run Putty on a Linux machine?
>
> I used it once just to confuse and confound co-workers and have it
> runable in Wine just to impress some other people.
>
> But I'd never seriously USE it for anything...  That's why I have ...
> um ... openssh and ... err ... telnet
>
> --
> Alan McKinnon
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
> --
> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
Haha i used Putty in Windows and use now on Linux because i known it... :P

Thx for all

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1338 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Bo Ørsted Andresen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 468 bytes --]

On Monday 14 January 2008 14:03:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Now I am confused. Why do you run Putty on a Linux machine?
>
> I used it once just to confuse and confound co-workers and have it
> runable in Wine just to impress some other people.

You do not need wine to run putty on Linux. There's a UNIX port. Just emerge 
putty and run it. Not that I don't agree it's useless with all the 
alternatives that are available on Linux too.. ;)

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Elyahou ITTAH]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]

2008/1/15, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>:
>
>
> You do not need wine to run putty on Linux. There's a UNIX port. Just
> emerge
> putty and run it. Not that I don't agree it's useless with all the
> alternatives that are available on Linux too.. ;)


What alternative  are you advice me ?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 584 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Alan McKinnon]

On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
> 2008/1/15, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>:
> > You do not need wine to run putty on Linux. There's a UNIX port.
> > Just emerge
> > putty and run it. Not that I don't agree it's useless with all the
> > alternatives that are available on Linux too.. ;)
>
> What alternative  are you advice me ?

openssh

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: SSH tunnel With Portage

[reader]

Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
>> 2008/1/15, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>:
>> > You do not need wine to run putty on Linux. There's a UNIX port.
>> > Just emerge
>> > putty and run it. Not that I don't agree it's useless with all the
>> > alternatives that are available on Linux too.. ;)
>>
>> What alternative  are you advice me ?
>
> openssh

Many of the same things available on putty are available on OpenSSH
too.  If you know putty it won't be real hard to learn to use
openSSH.  

I can tell you that you might get a good response at comp.security.ssh
with your questions too.  I always have there.  Its not about any
particular kind if ssh so openssh putty etc will fit in there.

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SSH tunnel With Portage

[Gabriel Rossetti]

reader@newsguy.com wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> writes:
>
>   
>> On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
>>     
>>> 2008/1/15, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>:
>>>       
>>>> You do not need wine to run putty on Linux. There's a UNIX port.
>>>> Just emerge
>>>> putty and run it. Not that I don't agree it's useless with all the
>>>> alternatives that are available on Linux too.. ;)
>>>>         
>>> What alternative  are you advice me ?
>>>       
>> openssh
>>     
>
> Many of the same things available on putty are available on OpenSSH
> too.  If you know putty it won't be real hard to learn to use
> openSSH.  
>
> I can tell you that you might get a good response at comp.security.ssh
> with your questions too.  I always have there.  Its not about any
> particular kind if ssh so openssh putty etc will fit in there.
>
>   
If what you want is to create tunnels, and you want a GUI (I imagine
this since you want to use putty), then why not use gstm Gnome SSH
Tunnel Manager : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gstm/)?

Gabriel
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:

> 2008/1/14, Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org>:

> > What application is running on the remote box, port 443? A SOCKS
> > server or something else?
>
> OpenSSH,  which  manage the redirections  alone.

What does this mean?

> I am on Linux :P and the configuration  is my Gentoo  Installation.
> 127.O.O.1 is my machine where putty is running, Xchat run with this
> proxy configuration: Socks5 127.0.0.1:8080
>
> After Many tests, this solution worked. Thx for that ;)
>
> But I am interested on a global configuration who pass all connection
> by the SSH tunnel.

Still, it's unclear what your exact configuration is. However, assuming 
that you're tunneling SOCKS, you could use socksify (configured to use 
SOCKS for every protocol and IP address) and launch the applications 
with 

socksify <appname>
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Alan McKinnon]

On Monday 14 January 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2008, Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
> > Thx for the Answer but  I think I asked the question wrong. I Use
> > Putty to bypass a HTTP proxy who do not let emerge Work.
> > So i wan't to run portage in my pc, not in the remote one. But i
> > wan't to sync passing the SSH tunnel who is configurated to listen
> > at the port 8080 of my localhost.
>
> It's not clear at all whether you have http access from your gentoo
> box. If so, did you try emerge-webrsync?

Elyahou,

What EXACTLY is failing? You are not giving any information we can work 
with, so please supply FULL information with ALL relevant details.

Does 'emerge --sync' fail? This has nothing to do with HTTP proxies as 
it's an rsync session

Does 'emerge <some package>' fail, and if so, what is the error message? 
This might well be a proxy, so can you see gentoo.org in a browser?

alan

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

[Pettersson, Martin]

If this can help you... 

I have a similar problem (two firewalls) but I solved it using revinetd
(tcp/ip gender changer run on Linux and maybe on Wine, I used puppy
Linux, all_in_one_quemu on a windows machine)

Add something like this to your /etc/make.conf

#to get rid of certificate check in case you run ssl
FETCHCOMMAND="/usr/bin/wget -t 5 -T 60 --no-check-certificate
--limit-rate=200k \${URI} -P \${DISTDIR}"
RESUMECOMMAND="/usr/bin/wget -c -t 5 -T 60 --no-check-certificate
--limit-rate=200k \${URI} -P \${DISTDIR}"
#
#to use the port of your choise
https_proxy="https://user:password@proxy_server:12345"
#
#Use ssl to stop timeconsuming antivirus scanning
GENTOO_MIRRORS="https://distfiles.gentoo.org/"

BR
Martin

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list