From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94089138330 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0025EE0B3C; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com (mail-wm0-f67.google.com [74.125.82.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 605FDE0A9D for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id o80so591397wme.0 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:10:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6zcWvvaejZ7hHyHe1RLtXcnnUBv56XItzHT7exy3WrE=; b=UtQvfEJcoeqhQLYIZh3l2074ycBDPJ10HptMbkQhrMl4PEajFWjnVFKbpqotcsULag FCCpL+uTYkgPun/wXYGY/REr+EvgutIBBVF2UjxBhZ5/WBUExRsKY4KLm9jPPar8hxL5 cnqZVAD5Y7sNFemEToBi1u0arMYlS9jubGWJlP4t+z5epLxn0w7Z17xeMKKdVOoMiVZs 4MMQZhJB/ZaZ2blxrQ8gsC/R8jdhdhhFW045aumvDxNjeZZwPcXOgZkTJplO4mLJROGy JjhTX1J+csdvILUjS++z+hSIGi98nrA9/xXvFPsESa7X8hl6XyuSFLFkAVgNRYnWrEXt ZqDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6zcWvvaejZ7hHyHe1RLtXcnnUBv56XItzHT7exy3WrE=; b=UOvqiEJFEsaKuA4PumWuzzMeQBAK242QznTPuKZLjNRoYj2ZYK1Lz9vJkxGKNzzueX /OVd1QYZOeY91lBUcVq6kBY4545DJ9cXRoy/osd96zSDHlrvV0injDhaVtiSMdM/bHJZ 7QP+H+fptwyV7yhfz0G/pfrU04IRuj4EF/Y7vIItsEnXTAFx3bhQoyyqdUOl8CxDP6p8 zAas2sjYBPhdFBEJMNQ76esuSjF33fBASxVkiS1KOupis04cbayZsdpWPkSjaAkNV9iw TPB6tG1UeH60V+vNw1nAsRubh+nn25fHp6naCxjXwgw04+7Qc3Qo1KAI/yTxUxiefeup C9eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOsaBljKzG3QYA2Vf0nOhLeraYUOuvyA84+FCcKw7hdum1u3AJszWHyCQmPTgZ/aw== X-Received: by 10.194.104.106 with SMTP id gd10mr178260wjb.55.1472508628847; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.1.93] ([209.212.109.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ya1sm36377419wjb.23.2016.08.29.15.10.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-updater: depclean removes it? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <57C48828.8070408@gmail.com> From: Alan McKinnon Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:10:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b6356cfc-402c-4354-b760-c96353487ce7 X-Archives-Hash: 2f8b2f19a19fabc39e957f780ef0e31e On 29/08/2016 21:29, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 08/29/2016 03:08 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: >> Did something change recently? >> >> I was doing some updates and noticed app-admin/python-updater was >> removed. It's still in the tree but the system decided it was no longer >> needed - was it removed from @system? >> > > It's no longer needed, its removal is intentional. What replaces it's functionality, or what is now in the codebase that guarantees the problems python-updater fixed can't happen anymore? Now and again I run it just for fun and sometimes python-updater finds something to rebuild. Which implies that it's either still needed or finding false positives. I'd like to know which is true :-)