From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-99191-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MeF90-0000HQ-30
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:26:02 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7B39E0498;
	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com (mail-yw0-f172.google.com [209.85.211.172])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5498E0498
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so545779ywh.2
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=1+5W59PLSSRV9RkTimfCP+ycyvB7BQ6rBZVuhXP+FdM=;
        b=Yvbb1mMTZZpZ1r77bT8Bf05UVYzViGbSawmSHwByWdc8XITS9LTR02XC8UzdQQaTJd
         NZXwdYgsYzYN+KNfSjbdiw6MV3dGmjVV/i96G0kdbCAA+V/L3uCRcvTyw44SKh3dncBE
         9uF6gJQG9otCpHj15syUzqYPPM1YeNUo5ndfU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=xv4a/i33N8gXMwk218NRcM8y7KnJy8mH/4fFon21IvrSuxhKpsyApCpNx/lVtlTo1W
         FEmoh7SdRH6KL3X73B/eyBEIIj9jJTvE3+BISXdw+plYiSp+zUW4NKp31+5RxWZ8TxTw
         ezywPNrT5cNM3nCSvJh/VIDlj5ctDg61kl0xs=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.169.18 with SMTP id r18mr656789ybe.111.1250803560565; Thu, 
	20 Aug 2009 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:26:00 -0400
Message-ID: <c6cb7500908201426n7dd0537cjc46e9f2be0c06b41@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer?
From: Simon Hunt <chesemonkyloma@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4cc0ae94c410471996560
X-Archives-Salt: 94c9f164-e88c-46cd-9957-a072c532e22e
X-Archives-Hash: e537246cf16aba3708f07aac96431e8f

--000e0cd4cc0ae94c410471996560
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I can't get a 1680x1050 framebuffer (my native resolution) or any widescreen
framebuffer on this intel iMac and the console looks pretty bad because of
it. The best I can use is 1024x768. I have a Radeon HD 2400 XT video card.
The Radeon framebuffer "radeonfb" in the kernel doesn't support this card.
What can I do?

--000e0cd4cc0ae94c410471996560
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<span class="postbody">I can&#39;t get a 1680x1050 framebuffer (my native
resolution) or any widescreen framebuffer on this intel iMac and the console looks pretty
bad because of it. The best I can use is 1024x768. I have a Radeon HD
2400 XT video card. The Radeon framebuffer &quot;radeonfb&quot; in the
kernel doesn&#39;t support this card. What can I do?<br></span>

--000e0cd4cc0ae94c410471996560--