From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDFC41396D0 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2965E2BC0E2; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C81D62BC09F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49] (2001-44b8-4197-2800-a37a-5ec1-db17-1e49.static.ipv6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:4197:2800:a37a:5ec1:db17:1e49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kensington) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DEAC3415B7 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Changing dependencies without upping version ?? References: <20170924173753.bxpluo4s6f42uojo@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:24:30 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170924173753.bxpluo4s6f42uojo@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5eb2d5ec-73dc-44e9-9d38-4ea8e9a8a7f8 X-Archives-Hash: 971dbf0cc7bf1611201882aec84c4453 On 09/25/2017 03:37 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. I see a few complaints in this thread, but nobody so far has elaborated on the problem they have with this change.