From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRpNR-00088J-1Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:01:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB4FCE09E5 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f201.google.com (mail-iw0-f201.google.com [209.85.223.201]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95592E0914 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so9653695iwn.32 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:51:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YolxZi4Q3+DrmrAUuZ7Ha61NcXa6wMeByQbd8X3W8Sg=; b=eGiFKKdysMwty3KUfqFGGMK4X69mWP1/I8SXNMoxNl0E0N/7E+jjN2IEgQ2D0bEn5i lUOBKQtyRNl4eZprY4MR/bUrriXT42X1xnhL1tRD0DvrTQUgQ8Iue4X3m0eU8IoklJEu oB6jzPkHwlkVhvF9M0Tku/QtjAj2Im8VJQaTM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lL8Zx+E3T1wN6C2DFXe4JpsBxru9A/f8UXSvGT78MlAt29BcQsn3B41gSjHl8RZ0EV ZE2CoC9XeZZPvqfAo+jh6m7lSkH8emnEfdlZorixc9iOzUGEmWA2n4rQ87SSon/MaJTY jQ3UhosHIVJjxyi9fbG5gfKdpsSFFcJNZXR5U= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.14 with SMTP id b14mr258890ibz.26.1262616678278; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:51:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B4138AB.3060602@asyr.hopto.org> References: <4B3B3043.20400@asyr.hopto.org> <200912301208.54359.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <4B3B38F2.6090006@asyr.hopto.org> <4B3CF04E.8070603@asyr.hopto.org> <4B406CDF.7010301@asyr.hopto.org> <4B4138AB.3060602@asyr.hopto.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 09:51:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported From: Joshua Murphy To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 30181293-9ced-48ed-8ffb-bbdcd431650f X-Archives-Hash: 675635baf0467496e80e05d2784d9616 2010/1/3 Thanasis : > on 01/04/2010 01:10 AM Krzysztof Halasa wrote the following: >> Thanasis writes: >> >> >>> Hmm..., but are EMBEDDED options suitable for a netbook like the A110L ? >>> >> This "EMBEDDED" just means "don't touch these unless you really know >> what you're doing". >> >> BTW I remember using VMSPLIT 2 GB : 2 GB on server-class machines, >> before they were upgraded to x86-64. >> > Do you mean that I should try it? Is there any gain over using > CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G ? Likely nothing noticeable, but here's a bit of a good coverage of the topic: http://kerneltrap.org/node/6067 -- Poison [BLX] Joshua M. Murphy