* [gentoo-user] Celeron is i686?
@ 2006-08-19 9:31 THUFIR HAWAT
2006-08-19 9:51 ` Uwe Thiem
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: THUFIR HAWAT @ 2006-08-19 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Is a Celeron D Process 310, 2.13 GHz, 533 MHz FSB, 256 KB L2 Cache
considered an x86, i586 or i686 in terms of the stage 3 tarballs.
Which is best for that type of chip?
thanks,
Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Celeron is i686?
2006-08-19 9:31 [gentoo-user] Celeron is i686? THUFIR HAWAT
@ 2006-08-19 9:51 ` Uwe Thiem
2006-08-19 10:08 ` THUFIR HAWAT
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Thiem @ 2006-08-19 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 19 August 2006 10:31, THUFIR HAWAT wrote:
> Is a Celeron D Process 310, 2.13 GHz, 533 MHz FSB, 256 KB L2 Cache
> considered an x86, i586 or i686 in terms of the stage 3 tarballs.
> Which is best for that type of chip?
That's P4-based, so it's a i686.
Uwe
--
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective.
http://www.SysEx.com.na
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Celeron is i686?
2006-08-19 9:51 ` Uwe Thiem
@ 2006-08-19 10:08 ` THUFIR HAWAT
2006-08-19 13:37 ` yuntao wu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: THUFIR HAWAT @ 2006-08-19 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 8/19/06, Uwe Thiem <uwix@iway.na> wrote:
> On 19 August 2006 10:31, THUFIR HAWAT wrote:
> > Is a Celeron D Process 310, 2.13 GHz, 533 MHz FSB, 256 KB L2 Cache
> > considered an x86, i586 or i686 in terms of the stage 3 tarballs.
> > Which is best for that type of chip?
>
> That's P4-based, so it's a i686.
[...]
Thanks, Uwe :)
-Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Celeron is i686?
2006-08-19 10:08 ` THUFIR HAWAT
@ 2006-08-19 13:37 ` yuntao wu
2006-08-19 17:35 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: yuntao wu @ 2006-08-19 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
How about Core2Duo?
On 8/19/06, THUFIR HAWAT <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/19/06, Uwe Thiem <uwix@iway.na> wrote:
> > On 19 August 2006 10:31, THUFIR HAWAT wrote:
> > > Is a Celeron D Process 310, 2.13 GHz, 533 MHz FSB, 256 KB L2 Cache
> > > considered an x86, i586 or i686 in terms of the stage 3 tarballs.
> > > Which is best for that type of chip?
> >
> > That's P4-based, so it's a i686.
> [...]
>
> Thanks, Uwe :)
>
>
> -Thufir
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
Name:Wu Yuntao
Tel:+86 10 6894 7584
Mobile:+86 138 1078 2887
eMail: wuyuntao.1122#gmail.com
MSN: ghostage#hotmail.com
( Please convert '#' into '@' )
Blog: http://aruytha.spaces.live.com
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Celeron is i686?
2006-08-19 13:37 ` yuntao wu
@ 2006-08-19 17:35 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-08-19 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 8/19/06, yuntao wu <wuyuntao.1122@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about Core2Duo?
i686 if you want a 32-bit system, x86_64 if you want a 64-bit system.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-19 17:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-19 9:31 [gentoo-user] Celeron is i686? THUFIR HAWAT
2006-08-19 9:51 ` Uwe Thiem
2006-08-19 10:08 ` THUFIR HAWAT
2006-08-19 13:37 ` yuntao wu
2006-08-19 17:35 ` Richard Fish
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox