From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmroP-00038F-5P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:02:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBFC0CXY003080; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:00:12 GMT Received: from mra02.ch.as12513.net (mra02.ch.as12513.net [82.153.252.24]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBFBtE61001775 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:55:14 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mra02.ch.as12513.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3623D4326 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:55:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra02.ch.as12513.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra02.ch.as12513.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20612-01-99 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:55:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (213-152-39-89.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.39.89]) by mra02.ch.as12513.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C673D4336 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:55:12 +0000 (GMT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) In-Reply-To: <200512121927.28300.peper@aster.pl> References: <200512121516.27545.peper@aster.pl> <7573e9640512120939q16bcfdceue6e7352a6e7029c5@mail.gmail.com> <200512121927.28300.peper@aster.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stroller Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Merging lvm partitions Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:55:10 +0000 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk X-Archives-Salt: d60de531-d622-4898-829d-affb824fae23 X-Archives-Hash: 1a2179ac5baa33b5c9e369ed1f400d26 On Dec 12, 2005, at 6:27 pm, Peper wrote: >> Why? If they really are LVM physical volumes, you can create a single >> (or modify an existing) volume group span both, and create or grow >> logical volumes without regards to the size of the individual >> partitions. > Just for order. I have 3 LVM partitions only beacause i've cleaned my > disk off > winshit in stages. I think the only way to do this is to add a second hard-drive to the volume group, move data off the physical volumes of the 3 partitions, use `parted` or `cfdisk` to delete the 3 partitions & create a new one, then add it back to the volume group & migrate all the data off the new disk.... but it would be unusual for anyone to bother to do so (if you're not worried about uptime you could prolly just copy the data off & back on again). The whole point of LVM is to have the sort of convenience that you've experienced during your removal of Windows from those partitions > And maybe one more thing: wouldn't it minimize logical volumes > fragmentation? Interesting question. I would think that the abstraction layer of LVM in itself introduces a performance hit, but would guess it's quite small. I think the most people using LVM are prepared to sacrifice a little performance for its convenience. Stroller. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list