From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-123702-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QSsdn-0006j8-2b
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:19:55 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65D9D1C053;
	Sat,  4 Jun 2011 15:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com (mail-px0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAB31C053
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  4 Jun 2011 15:18:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so1833985pxi.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:message-id
         :x-mailer:mime-version:content-language:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=8uvau0nt/T6NmTKg+FmOM4pL74EObOtjB1SQKzj+z8s=;
        b=JiElM4h71gjB+D9WbyRzywCueAsA0cNn+ex3/rG3YgMHZVI40veu6pH99J3PIf4GGU
         TvUXzBJ5tO/+owzmkR5cyTndwb1QBp4XC+7lWx2bViOM7mh5VcYl8gSVGlYbCjY0YAH1
         T1c7PODdVQgqWtFiuiBhQ3yeAHBCusNU1/Cg8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-language:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=gau63rg6nbC8vk8ySHKRN4rBpeqVNXVZ+BvC/5HjlwvtXTbmV0TB26FeBB2WjCQAUN
         Tk9XjfjxzEz48oQHz/Urq9URI438lh7KSwNdjT+tcb76z4H6HQrF157dBJEQxf/lYM8a
         UG0MhDvRiuRNPFCxix4ujIHUXXxeKegsnLtPE=
Received: by 10.68.0.69 with SMTP id 5mr1273585pbc.241.1307200713208;
        Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.162.160.69] ([180.214.232.22])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w2sm2291725pbg.85.2011.06.04.08.18.29
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Pandu Poluan <pepoluan@gmail.com>
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Threads changing  Was: OT: website design
Date: Sat,  4 Jun 2011 22:17:51 +0700
Message-ID: <bKZStLMwhf6w.wcz8SYl9@smtp.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: EPOC Email Version 2.10
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: i-default
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: eabb0b3c2406773ffff0515e0057ee0a

-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing  Was: OT: website =
design
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
Date: 2011-06-04 21:54

Indi wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Dale wrote:
>>   =20
>>>
>>> That one was inline with the rest.  Yeppie !!
>>>
>>>     =20
>> Thanks for the confirmation, and for mentioning it in the first =
place.
>> I couldn't tell of course, because they all looked fine on usenet =
and
>> there was no local email to compare the view.
>>
>> It's a bit embarrassing to be "the threadbreaker", but at least it =
wasn't
>> my fault. :P
>>

Sometimes our hands are forced by situation beyond our control =
;)

>I suspected it was whatever device was being used.  Sort of like top =

>posting.  Some people have to top post because the device they are using =

>won't let them reply any other way.
>

Now you're ribbing me :P

That said, yeah Gmail's Java Mobile client sucks when it comes to =
top-posting: Click Reply (or, in my case, choose 'Reply' from the menu), =
and I'm given an *empty* textbox to write my reply, which *will* be =
top-posted. And I totally have no say in that.

(And it sucks royally that midway through writing a reply, I'd forget what =
exactly was written in the email I'm replying through, necessitating a =
'Save Draft', back to reading the email, then 'Resume =
Draft').

But now I've pulled my emails to my E72-1's native email client, and I can =
now properly bottom-post, with a caveat: I have to manually insert the '>' =
to indicate the quoted original email.

Oh well.

>I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed somewhere =

>to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using.  I =

>just know this is going to happen again.

It depends on the mail-to-usenet gateway, methinks.

>We are back to normal again.  :-)   Then again, I never was normal =

>anyway.  ;-)

We're using Gentoo, so we all can't be normal =
;)

Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~

Sent from Nokia E72-1