From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FxVPa-0008An-Hx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:52:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k63KltRS013505; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:47:55 GMT Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k63KPP3n000365 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:25:26 GMT Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so556833nzh for ; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IKljwHFsMyfbdHVdl1PX0i8buv0HI40A2wGPnpfjysx+fhhXcYpAFxfrWcjJC55qmKgKV3EFNzdgPWyBeldGDfUoxmV+W3GgHEabqNdb3XlEnUKiWcrV0FXPFkTq7de727JfLywrABf+fGnQep5MItXhVj4KxYwTp+wF2xqE0iI= Received: by 10.36.118.8 with SMTP id q8mr2467982nzc; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.10.5 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 17:25:25 -0300 From: "Bruno Lustosa" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] X.org is b0rked - BadIdChoice In-Reply-To: <44A97910.2000600@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44A9721B.9070608@gentoo.org> <44A97910.2000600@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f4836532-0b97-427c-a795-46321a3364e3 X-Archives-Hash: 18045e95182ca132d619098b52bbb080 On 7/3/06, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > It's ~arch, you shouldn't get it unless you're running an ~arch system > or specifically added it to package.keywords. I am. My system is all ~x86, except for gcc, glibc and binutils, because I had an awful experience with those in the past, which left the system completely unusable. glibc problems aren't something we want to have to deal with (even python didn't run, so no portage to help). > I don't think it should be tied into having anything else upgraded, with > the exception of xproto 7.0.7, so I'm a bit surprised you're hitting > these bugs. Good job tracking it down, though. Yes, perhaps instead of masking individual package versions, I should leave some of those packages tied to x86, that would still allow some updates. Anyway, I have the habit of looking at package.* and recheck if things still need to be there. For example, I still have the unmasks for gnome-2.14, which I think aren't needed anymore, so I'll remove them. -- Bruno Lustosa ZCE - Zend Certified Engineer - PHP! http://www.lustosa.net/ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list