From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD488139083 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4D35E0EC0; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yb0-x242.google.com (mail-yb0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE2FE0CAB for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb0-x242.google.com with SMTP id k2so990087ybd.2 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 06:05:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e5jF/JAKgFZnTvUUNvMde2gXKYTxztCATXwL4n5vpuQ=; b=LfACdhF9vcc7YHb0kIDe3kfSCOjM9R4JBDkHbY3t1WOtcD2rktN7ouLSz+/+H4uvXD nX7nxE9xf7XaimamxOqvrzXMPcSOn4mse8y2OnYCzMOdu4HuS9mNKnw9RB520oqFmeLk dHffHm0rtPcsYYQ4OtlsnH6V61+3pjhAHXKcD9An0LW7SH8BtIGTIinAfDFgkscnZf+j +LB2IxJ+Pwfh0x0lWXB9UbtpKb3UrSkjkGWpfXiKxBvXPeSBr0yBQ/FGeWE73gpbuv7w AkUKxrRI4UQ127siRf2hHQ8BsnvUw4agzZhdLlvv4gBsfc0Qmn8FcJxoOdiH+XOS5PJS awfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e5jF/JAKgFZnTvUUNvMde2gXKYTxztCATXwL4n5vpuQ=; b=p8KoVeS6yyuH8pfcL4bCELwRuVc0r4GC+ivph41ksefLhbJj0aONb9LMwAa80oZNEv pynQb9YsJw6KiMwWHMO06gJ2zzx0SMVejeUop9tmagL/0Z7yqzudBhWvE9JZOB8XoY/Z 87Fjp/xhjC5HdogcWY7fH7mgUUWcaCPe2V8fpf5yphOXAOSF5TADKrqmf7RRE7i+JO91 4uluLrchqC29qaUUrbD9G9VkBqizFS60MAeeH+sTy5r84v7vVFQFeZbS8v5ZiIeoTz1i iLSRLdJ4rRqw646rrk+2Iz8q/dZ5wkLvZCdbyKeZDPrqovt2gHGxUVBl5SYMOY4wwr+G FeEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKUGedFc9RnwJnFVLpkD/JoMPjk/t4asec3rzKBo6OkK5c6TJIe VmVTtHdCzV5mB2iuXf11vYc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoukYN6SZMSW0NVmIDjA2A6YIjYTJ2eijlW/aV5fBMK9WXs7hIAyhtCFNyP/h9dwFWq5gynI7Q== X-Received: by 10.37.177.141 with SMTP id h13mr1699261ybj.69.1513173918434; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 06:05:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-93-225.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.93.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p62sm724658ywc.63.2017.12.13.06.05.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 06:05:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <6582741.F9gJHCEsXr@dell_xps> <4d3facb7-abec-2c0e-7fd0-02e2daee3f95@gmail.com> <20171213110403.6c5f2217@digimed.co.uk> <2414437.FVJPxv1ApR@thetick> From: Dale Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:05:13 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2414437.FVJPxv1ApR@thetick> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: c6152678-ccd6-4791-93ba-96e84aa16c3f X-Archives-Hash: 61bbeb41c69074c4af5e02871078c0ca Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2017, 12:04:03 CET schrieb Neil Bothwick: >> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:06:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> Some historical correctnesses about Canek: >>> >>> - He has been here for years >>> - He has contributed here for years >>> - He supports systemd and has offered more help and explanation about >>> systemd to it's users on this list than any other single person, bar >>> none >>> - He has never, not once, slagged off SysV Init, OpenRC or any other >>> init system, ot the creators or the users >>> - He has never posted rude or inflamatory comments about anyone arguing >>> against him >>> - He has never resorted to ad-hominem and never posted any knee jerk >>> opinions about any other poster wrt their stance on init systems >>> >>> If we look at the reverse we see a very different picture, and it's >>> right here in this very thread. To the poster who rudely commented about >>> Canek being a professor and that doesn't make him right and that he is >>> one voice, step back pal and take a very long hard look at what you >>> said. Yes, it doesn't make him right. Also doesn't make him wrong. His >>> posts and the content are what make him right or wrong. There truly are >>> fan bois on this list, but Canek is not one of them. It's the >>> systemd-haters and Poeterring-haters who are being fan bois, painting >>> all detractors with the same brush. >> +1 >> >> It was Canek's rational explanations about systemd that made me >> interested enough to try it, and I'm glad I did. He made good technical >> arguments in favour of it whereas most of the arguments against it are >> either based on Lennartphobia or false fact gained from other systemd >> haters. > +1 to both Alan and Neil. > >> I also see the position as somewhat different with Gentoo, because openrc >> is so much better than the other "traditional" systems out there, in fact >> it shares some of the benefits of systemd. As a result, I run a mixture >> of both systems. I prefer systemd now, but not enough to go through the >> hassle of switching over an already working system. That wouldn't be the >> case if those other systems weren't running openrc. > That echoes my own sentiment pretty well. OpenRC is one reason I stayed with > Gentoo, because it seemed better to me than the way other distros did things > (well, better than Suse, at least, which was the other distro I tried way back > then). > > However, now I default to systemd, because for me it's even better than > OpenRC. Plus, I don't have so many systems that I couldn't migrate them all > :-) . > And yet Canek is the only person on this mailing list to EVER get on my blacklist for his posts.  That was years ago.  To this day, I don't get any of his messages or read anything quoted from him.  Even the troll who had his own script, kept griping about Gentoo and its update process and refused to listen to anyone didn't make it to the blacklist level.  Eventually, some comrel member or something booted them off the list.  I have to say, -1 for me.  He managed to join a extremely exclusive club with me.  He sits on a blacklist that no one else ever managed to get on.  Dale :-)  :-)