From: "James Ausmus" <james.ausmus@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Please explain why this new 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' is good?
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:02:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b79f23070901081202j66fbdcc3pf5bb371e6e3cbecf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0901081149s54cc6df2q7194d06af019792e@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3144 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, James Ausmus <james.ausmus@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus <james.ausmus@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus <
> james.ausmus@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> >> >> >> warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by
> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11,
> >> >> >> not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
> >> >> >> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11: undefined reference to
> >> >> >> `FC_GetFunctionList@NSS_3.4'
> >> >> >> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11: undefined reference to
> >> >> >> `NSC_ModuleDBFunc@NSS_3.4'
> >> >> >> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11: undefined reference to
> >> >> >> `NSC_GetFunctionList@NSS_3.4'
> >> >> >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >> >> >> make[4]: *** [contact-print-test] Error 1
> >> >> >> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hmm, and the mystery deepens... It looks like the source of the
> issue
> >> >> > is
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > "warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by
> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11,
> >> >> > not
> >> >> > found" message - libsoftokn3.so has the ModuleDBFunc symbol in it,
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > it is
> >> >> > owned by the nss package, so I'm not sure what is going on there.
> >> >> > What
> >> >> > does
> >> >> > a "ls /usr/lib/nss/libsoft*" return?
> >> >> > -James
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Version 12 apparently:
> >> >>
> >> >> lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libsoft*
> >> >> /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn.a /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.so
> >> >> /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.chk /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.so.12
> >> >> lightning ~ #
> >> >
> >> > Very interesting - so you have the Evolution build using the .11
> version
> >> > of
> >> > libnss3, but you have ther .12 version of libsoftkn3 - what do you see
> >> > from
> >> > a "ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*"?
> >> >
> >> lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*
> >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
> >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.12
> >> lightning ~ #
> >
> > Aha! And which of the versioned .so's is libnss3.so linking to?
> >
> lightning ~ # ls -l /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2009-01-08 10:00
> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so -> libnss3.so.12
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 560376 2008-11-25 17:02 /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1337104 2009-01-08 10:00 /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.12
> lightning ~ #
>
Hmm - very odd - seems that the evolution build is specifically grabbing the
libnss3.so.11 version... Maybe try running "ldconfig"? If that doesn't work,
maybe try deleting (or renaming, if you're paranoid ;) ) libnss3.so.11 (and
all other .so.11's that you find in /usr/lib/nss).
Anyone else have any better ideas?
-James
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4795 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-08 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-08 17:20 [gentoo-user] Please explain why this new 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' is good? Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 17:42 ` Graham Murray
2009-01-08 17:51 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 17:58 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-08 18:03 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 18:07 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 18:24 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 18:55 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 19:23 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 19:29 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 19:36 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 19:39 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 19:45 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 19:49 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 20:02 ` James Ausmus [this message]
2009-01-08 22:35 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 23:21 ` James Ausmus
2009-01-08 23:56 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-09 1:38 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 17:47 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-08 17:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-01-08 17:53 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 18:00 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-08 18:05 ` Mark Knecht
2009-01-08 21:59 ` Momesso Andrea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b79f23070901081202j66fbdcc3pf5bb371e6e3cbecf@mail.gmail.com \
--to=james.ausmus@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox