From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-157395-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16B113877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:07:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABC82E0F9B;
	Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:07:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E596E0F6C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:07:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [212.54.42.134] (helo=smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net)
	by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <joost@antarean.org>)
	id 1XB7JY-0008Jl-He
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:07:28 +0200
Received: from 53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.145.96] helo=data.antarean.org)
	by smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <joost@antarean.org>)
	id 1XB7JY-0002Vt-4Q
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:07:28 +0200
Received: from [10.20.13.30] (unknown [10.20.13.30])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32ADC4C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:07:12 +0200 (CEST)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <201407261927.15993.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
References: <53D3E7B8.5060908@googlemail.com> <lr0q8e$sso$1@ger.gmane.org> <53D3F218.8040905@googlemail.com> <201407261927.15993.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it.
From: "J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:07:26 +0200
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <b5dd7f6a-5f62-4d1b-ab5f-a31dec17b52f@email.android.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Ziggo-spambar: ----
X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9
X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982
X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-Archives-Salt: c52748e7-e663-4578-98b7-7c6b767e4961
X-Archives-Hash: 30443386fbb56c860e8640ea8494f00e

On 26 July 2014 20:27:14 CEST, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 19:23:20 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am 26.07.2014 19:58, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
>> > On 26/07/14 20:39, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> and this, my children, is why I am using ECC ram.
>> >=20
>> > I don't really care if the porn I'm watching has one frame with
>> > corrupted pixels on it.
>>=20
>> but you will care when your kernel writes the next file right over
>the
>> partition boundary.
>
>Ooh!  Scary!  O_O
>
>Isn't there some kind of kernel/fs check mechanism that ought to check
>this=20
>doesn't happen?

There is. But all that happens in memory...

--
Joost
--=20
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.