From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-194827-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DBF01382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:00:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA54EE09AE;
	Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:00:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E879E097C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:00:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host86-157-192-59.range86-157.btcentralplus.com ([86.157.192.59] helo=[192.168.1.65])
	by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim)
	(envelope-from <antlists@youngman.org.uk>)
	id 1kz8yb-0004jT-Dg
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:00:05 +0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Your opinion on jpeg encoders, please
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <X/OKnhCvbi17X4mJ@kern> <rt5ra0$5a0$1@ciao.gmane.io>
 <93bee44a-f976-194a-7c24-f5c7daf95c22@youngman.org.uk>
 <X/ymYu9xb2TafYJS@kern>
From: antlists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
Message-ID: <b56f3511-28cc-deef-1c14-79e199927664@youngman.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:00:03 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <X/ymYu9xb2TafYJS@kern>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4eb36143-8c32-4781-8003-2bbe9661a7cb
X-Archives-Hash: 9b048f3e97b6cc66cf1ba3939c01d444

On 11/01/2021 19:26, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> I don’t really live the RAW way. They take up sooo much space and my
> camera’s OOC jpegs always look far nicer than anything I can produce with
> darktable/rawtherapee.

Okay, dunno about your Olympus stuff, but my Nikon cameras, the Nikon 
software is supposed to "load raw, save as jpeg", and it should come out 
identical to the jpeg that came off the camera.

I do know, though, that some software (quite possibly that Nikon stuff) 
won't run under wine, blowing up with "unknown version of Windows" or 
something like that. So you might have the same problem ...

Cheers,
Wol