From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-111077-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OET4N-0007YV-LR
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 20:07:15 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77050E064E;
	Tue, 18 May 2010 20:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from borg.medozas.de (borg.medozas.de [188.40.89.202])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FADE064E
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 May 2010 20:06:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by borg.medozas.de (Postfix, from userid 25121)
	id C84E6F0C2CFD1; Tue, 18 May 2010 22:06:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by borg.medozas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE103D097;
	Tue, 18 May 2010 22:06:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:06:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
To: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at>
cc: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, Daniel Troeder <daniel@admin-box.com>, 
    walt <w41ter@gmail.com>, Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net>, 
    Jason Dusek <jason.dusek@gmail.com>, Till Maas <opensource@till.name>, 
    hanno@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure
In-Reply-To: <4BF2EB88.8010403@xunil.at>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1005182157010.31732@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1005161417240.29448@obet.zrqbmnf.qr> <4BF108F3.1080304@xunil.at> <alpine.LSU.2.01.1005181504030.28404@obet.zrqbmnf.qr> <4BF299B4.2040306@xunil.at> <alpine.LSU.2.01.1005181758230.26328@obet.zrqbmnf.qr> <4BF2C6A7.6040607@xunil.at>
 <alpine.LSU.2.01.1005181949290.23953@obet.zrqbmnf.qr> <4BF2E336.8030106@xunil.at> <4BF2EB88.8010403@xunil.at>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LSU 1266 2009-07-14)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Archives-Salt: ee261a03-e0a6-4ccc-af68-acdff7902dfe
X-Archives-Hash: 1b25760099ff81f4b354c52e1c38d578


On Tuesday 2010-05-18 21:33, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>Am 18.05.2010 20:57, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> On the other hand I would like to get that done right, sure.
>> 
>> Any howto without pmt-ehd that would keep me safe from newlines etc
>> (btw. there were NO newlines in that hexdump-output)?
>
>Created a new encrypted LV and used "--key-file=-" as mentioned in:
>
>http://pam-mount.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=pam-mount/pam-mount;a=blob;hb=master;f=doc/bugs.txt
>
>Still no success with 2.x ...

Debugging preexisting containers is hard (because people usually don't
share that.)

Since you are starting with a blank one, I would love to see your
failing testcase -- i.e. sequence of shell commands to trigger the
unanticipated behavior, such as the existing testcases in
src/t-crypt:

  echo that | openssl whatever
  cryptsetup luksFoo,Format,Open that.
  mkfs
  cryptsetup luksClose
  mount.crypt -o [...]

It does not need to follow t-crypt's style, just the sequence alone
is good.