Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerging virtual/editor installs nano - why?

["Alexander Skwar" <alexanders.mailinglists+nospam@gmail.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 1060 bytes --]

On Dec 7, 2007 4:37 PM, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@zlin.dk> wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007 16:21:31 Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > So the expectation should be, that it's not going to be possible
> > to preselect an mta the way I've shown, as soon as virtual/mta
> > is converted to a new style virtual.
> >
> > Is that right? Is there work going on to change all the old
> > style virtuals to new style ones?
>
> You are right except for the fact that virtual/mta will not be converted any
> time soon (if ever). Old style virtuals allow their providers to block all
> other providers by blocking the virtual. This isn't possible with the current
> format for new style virtuals so it isn't going to happen. editor didn't need
> that feature and thus could easily be converted...

Ah, okay. Pretty bad situation, though, isn't it? I mean,
with the way it is now, we've got some virtuals which
work with virtuals and some, which don't. Do you happen
to know, if there's a bug which should rectify this
broken situation?

Alexander
éí¢‹¬z¸\x1ežÚ(¢¸&j)bž	b²