From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-87119-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1L6izJ-0007Y6-3Y
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:53:13 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEEB8E04C8;
Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:53:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.145])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD5BE04C8
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:53:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so767566eyk.10
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:53:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=zrm1buwCql7AYZJ7rf0D0ulSn4yKRT+6dDl8EltEdFg=;
b=ozEt88kTgGdUlMGgmEMzknBr41yVbKDvPXH7n2oyzxCZApaKbaKwoaVoolNjK/94yv
CBWQXqMsCmpbsy1A15iw7yeDl8tIn6R/eRGoorDCno7nwilvfvCr0y2mHfMpBY8rltYo
S8ZqDNvgx2jm2JO9ijqqtijKAgeq8LFkqi/N4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references;
b=Fwl4OO1FIvfzxl8x81IIiJmb7jf56wsevwg5vL/k/COdWRf6+TdGmQU2R4SRoEUPBJ
n0xYYhoOvDruOkrDSFlvL5dOt31VcHe++Q+g3jR7qyUExfudAZ2wBhTYYS5Xej0m/exS
Co/IhlKIh5LSRLDwbYGJlmg0YyQI+TMJymEsc=
Received: by 10.103.121.19 with SMTP id y19mr3968575mum.56.1228038790825;
Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.103.182.12 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ae107db90811300153n6553dd66vb8d477ffee96078@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:53:10 +0200
From: "Daniel Iliev" <daniel.iliev@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Fragmentation of my drives. Curious mostly
In-Reply-To: <20081130015823.496621b2@ilievnet.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <492FD2A2.5080301@gmail.com> <20081129110921.75a6e346@ilievnet.com>
<ae107db90811290119r655e8d13ud887e5bed5920e73@mail.gmail.com>
<200811291223.23344.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
<20081130015823.496621b2@ilievnet.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 985102e7-feee-4c99-bfbf-e61332c09a6b
X-Archives-Hash: 908b2e8124a5406bc535e51564a0f6a5
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:45:40 +0000
Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> No, and nor should they. Each filesystem implementing its own
> encryption layer would be a nightmare. A separate encryption layer on
> which you create any filesystem you like is much more sensible.
It's true for Linux and any other kernel designed to work with many
implementations of "the same" thing (FS in this case). MS doesn't care
about many file systems, but just their own, therefore they don't
face this problem.
--
Best regards,
Daniel