[gentoo-user] Network scanner

[gentoo-user] Network scanner

[thelma]

I've a Brother scanner ADS-2400N connected via network port.

- I edit: /etc/sane.d/saned.conf (entered my network address: 10.0.0.1)
- started: /etc/init.d/saned
- installed brother printer drivers:
  rpm  -ihv  --nodeps brscan4-0.4.4-1.x86_64.rpm

  # brsaneconfig4 -q |grep 2400
 65 "ADS-2400N"

but when I run as user: "scanimage -L"
device `epson2:libusb:002:003' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner

only my epson scanner is showing up, NO Brother scanner is detected.

What am I missing?

-- 
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner

[Alan McKinnon]

On 24/02/2017 23:25, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I've a Brother scanner ADS-2400N connected via network port.
> 
> - I edit: /etc/sane.d/saned.conf (entered my network address: 10.0.0.1)
> - started: /etc/init.d/saned
> - installed brother printer drivers:
>   rpm  -ihv  --nodeps brscan4-0.4.4-1.x86_64.rpm
> 
>   # brsaneconfig4 -q |grep 2400
>  65 "ADS-2400N"
> 
> but when I run as user: "scanimage -L"
> device `epson2:libusb:002:003' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner
> 
> only my epson scanner is showing up, NO Brother scanner is detected.
> 
> What am I missing?


Maybe that you are using a Red Hat package manager on a Gentoo machine?
Or that you wanted to ask fedora-user and sent it to gentoo-user by mistake?



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner

[thelma]

On 02/24/2017 02:28 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/02/2017 23:25, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> I've a Brother scanner ADS-2400N connected via network port.
>>
>> - I edit: /etc/sane.d/saned.conf (entered my network address: 10.0.0.1)
>> - started: /etc/init.d/saned
>> - installed brother printer drivers:
>>   rpm  -ihv  --nodeps brscan4-0.4.4-1.x86_64.rpm
>>
>>   # brsaneconfig4 -q |grep 2400
>>  65 "ADS-2400N"
>>
>> but when I run as user: "scanimage -L"
>> device `epson2:libusb:002:003' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner
>>
>> only my epson scanner is showing up, NO Brother scanner is detected.
>>
>> What am I missing?
> 
> 
> Maybe that you are using a Red Hat package manager on a Gentoo machine?
> Or that you wanted to ask fedora-user and sent it to gentoo-user by mistake?

No, Brother only supply rpm or deb drivers.
I was able to use "rpm" to install brother driver this way, so it should
work with the scanner as well.

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner

[Alan McKinnon]

On 24/02/2017 23:46, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 02:28 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 24/02/2017 23:25, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I've a Brother scanner ADS-2400N connected via network port.
>>>
>>> - I edit: /etc/sane.d/saned.conf (entered my network address: 10.0.0.1)
>>> - started: /etc/init.d/saned
>>> - installed brother printer drivers:
>>>   rpm  -ihv  --nodeps brscan4-0.4.4-1.x86_64.rpm
>>>
>>>   # brsaneconfig4 -q |grep 2400
>>>  65 "ADS-2400N"
>>>
>>> but when I run as user: "scanimage -L"
>>> device `epson2:libusb:002:003' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner
>>>
>>> only my epson scanner is showing up, NO Brother scanner is detected.
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>
>>
>> Maybe that you are using a Red Hat package manager on a Gentoo machine?
>> Or that you wanted to ask fedora-user and sent it to gentoo-user by mistake?
> 
> No, Brother only supply rpm or deb drivers.
> I was able to use "rpm" to install brother driver this way, so it should
> work with the scanner as well.

I see. Should != will, and assume is the mother of all fuckups

Well, I'm not here to fix every problem you encounter and judging by the
sheer amount of posting you make and the level of content, I have to
conclude that you are assuming we are.

What steps have YOU taken to try figure this out and actually help
yourself? Saying that you installed an rpm on a Gentoo machine and stuff
don't work, what's wrong? is not the expected level of troubleshooting.

I think you should google for "How to ask smart questions" by Eric S.
Raymond


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner

[thelma]

On 02/24/2017 02:28 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/02/2017 23:25, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> I've a Brother scanner ADS-2400N connected via network port.
>>
>> - I edit: /etc/sane.d/saned.conf (entered my network address: 10.0.0.1)
>> - started: /etc/init.d/saned
>> - installed brother printer drivers:
>>   rpm  -ihv  --nodeps brscan4-0.4.4-1.x86_64.rpm
>>
>>   # brsaneconfig4 -q |grep 2400
>>  65 "ADS-2400N"
>>
>> but when I run as user: "scanimage -L"
>> device `epson2:libusb:002:003' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner
>>
>> only my epson scanner is showing up, NO Brother scanner is detected.
>>
>> What am I missing?
> 
> 
> Maybe that you are using a Red Hat package manager on a Gentoo machine?
> Or that you wanted to ask fedora-user and sent it to gentoo-user by mistake?

I think I'm missing entry in make.conf:
I have
SANE_BACKENDS="epson2"

but I'm not sure what to enter for brother scanner.

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner

[Dale]

thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 02:28 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 24/02/2017 23:25, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I've a Brother scanner ADS-2400N connected via network port.
>>>
>>> - I edit: /etc/sane.d/saned.conf (entered my network address: 10.0.0.1)
>>> - started: /etc/init.d/saned
>>> - installed brother printer drivers:
>>>   rpm  -ihv  --nodeps brscan4-0.4.4-1.x86_64.rpm
>>>
>>>   # brsaneconfig4 -q |grep 2400
>>>  65 "ADS-2400N"
>>>
>>> but when I run as user: "scanimage -L"
>>> device `epson2:libusb:002:003' is a Epson GT-9300 flatbed scanner
>>>
>>> only my epson scanner is showing up, NO Brother scanner is detected.
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>
>> Maybe that you are using a Red Hat package manager on a Gentoo machine?
>> Or that you wanted to ask fedora-user and sent it to gentoo-user by mistake?
> I think I'm missing entry in make.conf:
> I have
> SANE_BACKENDS="epson2"
>
> but I'm not sure what to enter for brother scanner.
>
> --
> Thelma
>
>


Unless you are using portage to install the Brother drivers, I don't
think that setting will matter.  Emerge takes note of settings there
when it is about to build packages.  If you install a package by hand,
outside portage, it won't likely matter. 

I might add this for future reference.  Before buying equipment, make
sure it works with Linux, the distro you use for sure.  Some brands work
pretty easy but has some models that don't.  HP for example generally
works however, I've seen certain models that have something unique about
them that causes them to not work at all or only certain limited
functions.  In my experience Lexmark is one that I have never got to
work, any model.  I avoid Lexmark like it's a disease.  Scanners are in
the same boat as printers, since some have both built in. 

I've seen on this list where some seem to have got Brother to work. 
Maybe a search of past threads would shed some light.  They might have
some tiny snippet that helps get you on the road to success. 

Dale

:-)  :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:58 -0600, Dale wrote:

> > I think I'm missing entry in make.conf:
> > I have
> > SANE_BACKENDS="epson2"
> >
> > but I'm not sure what to enter for brother scanner.

> Unless you are using portage to install the Brother drivers, I don't
> think that setting will matter.  Emerge takes note of settings there
> when it is about to build packages.  If you install a package by hand,
> outside portage, it won't likely matter. 

That's right, the setting tells portage which of the drivers from
sane-backends you want installed. The Brother drivers aren't in
sane-backends.

> I've seen on this list where some seem to have got Brother to work. 
> Maybe a search of past threads would shed some light.  They might have
> some tiny snippet that helps get you on the road to success. 

I had a Brother AIO devices and did have it working. Search bugzilla for 
an ebuild for the Brother proprietary drivers.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I've got a Mickey Mouse PC with a Goofy operating system.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Network scanner

[Ian Zimmerman]

On 2017-02-24 23:46, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> Well, I'm not here to fix every problem you encounter and judging by
> the sheer amount of posting you make and the level of content, I have
> to conclude that you are assuming we are.
> 
> What steps have YOU taken to try figure this out and actually help
> yourself? Saying that you installed an rpm on a Gentoo machine and
> stuff don't work, what's wrong? is not the expected level of
> troubleshooting.
> 
> I think you should google for "How to ask smart questions" by Eric S.
> Raymond

Hi Alan,

I would give Thelma a break; a couple of times she found the solution
subsequent to posting.  Thus, I believe the size of her output is more
due to extra chattiness than to sloth :-)

This happens to me too sometimes, and I think practice helped me to
improve in this respect, so I think it will help others too.

-- 
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
Don't clear-text sign: http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Network scanner

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1369 bytes --]

On Friday 24 Feb 2017 16:05:13 Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-02-24 23:46, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Well, I'm not here to fix every problem you encounter and judging by
> > the sheer amount of posting you make and the level of content, I have
> > to conclude that you are assuming we are.
> > 
> > What steps have YOU taken to try figure this out and actually help
> > yourself? Saying that you installed an rpm on a Gentoo machine and
> > stuff don't work, what's wrong? is not the expected level of
> > troubleshooting.
> > 
> > I think you should google for "How to ask smart questions" by Eric S.
> > Raymond
> 
> Hi Alan,
> 
> I would give Thelma a break; a couple of times she found the solution
> subsequent to posting.  Thus, I believe the size of her output is more
> due to extra chattiness than to sloth :-)
> 
> This happens to me too sometimes, and I think practice helped me to
> improve in this respect, so I think it will help others too.

Good point, often preparing to ask a question helps solve it, or at least 
helps focus on what is most likely to be the problem.

Back on topic, I always held the view that one should not mix and match 
package managers on the same system, as they may end up stepping on each 
other's toes.  So, I thought emerge and rpm don't go together.  Is this not 
the case?
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Network scanner

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 778 bytes --]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 07:35:43 +0000, Mick wrote:

> Back on topic, I always held the view that one should not mix and match 
> package managers on the same system, as they may end up stepping on
> each other's toes.  So, I thought emerge and rpm don't go together.  Is
> this not the case?

Using another package manager is no worse than installing from source,
either way you are installing software without the knowledge of portage.
A better solution is to look for an ebuild on Bugzilla, which probably
ends up installing the same files but now portage knows about that.

There's even an rpm eclass for such ebuilds to call on when software is
only available as an RPM package.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Network scanner

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 853 bytes --]

On Saturday 25 Feb 2017 08:25:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 07:35:43 +0000, Mick wrote:
> > Back on topic, I always held the view that one should not mix and match
> > package managers on the same system, as they may end up stepping on
> > each other's toes.  So, I thought emerge and rpm don't go together.  Is
> > this not the case?
> 
> Using another package manager is no worse than installing from source,
> either way you are installing software without the knowledge of portage.
> A better solution is to look for an ebuild on Bugzilla, which probably
> ends up installing the same files but now portage knows about that.
> 
> There's even an rpm eclass for such ebuilds to call on when software is
> only available as an RPM package.

Yes, this is my understanding too.  Thanks for confirming.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner

[Daniel Frey]

On 02/24/2017 01:46 PM, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
> No, Brother only supply rpm or deb drivers.
> I was able to use "rpm" to install brother driver this way, so it should
> work with the scanner as well.
> 

This is not always the case, I had a Dell printer using an RPM that
would not install properly. It was placing files in places where Gentoo
did not expect to see them. I unpacked it and installed it manually and
got it working.

The easiest way to install it is to see if there's an ebuild available
in an overlay.

Scanners can be picky in linux. I bought a Canon flatbad knowing it had
support in linux. A newer model of the same line of scanner that I have
is *not* supported properly in linux. To give you an idea.

Dan

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[thelma]

On 02/24/2017 03:19 PM, Dale wrote:
> thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On 02/24/2017 02:28 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2017 23:25, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>>> I've a Brother scanner ADS-2400N connected via network port.
[snip]

> 
> Unless you are using portage to install the Brother drivers, I don't
> think that setting will matter.  Emerge takes note of settings there
> when it is about to build packages.  If you install a package by hand,
> outside portage, it won't likely matter. 
> 
> I might add this for future reference.  Before buying equipment, make
> sure it works with Linux, the distro you use for sure.  Some brands work
> pretty easy but has some models that don't.  HP for example generally
> works however, I've seen certain models that have something unique about
> them that causes them to not work at all or only certain limited
> functions.  In my experience Lexmark is one that I have never got to
> work, any model.  I avoid Lexmark like it's a disease.  Scanners are in
> the same boat as printers, since some have both built in. 
> 
> I've seen on this list where some seem to have got Brother to work. 
> Maybe a search of past threads would shed some light.  They might have
> some tiny snippet that helps get you on the road to success. 
> 
> Dale
> 
> :-)  :-)

Apology for all those annoying questions.

I was able to make it to work:
rpm  -ihv  --nodeps brscan4-0.4.4-1.x86_64.rpm
emerge -avq media-gfx/brother-scan3-bin
brsaneconfig4 -a  name=Brother model=ADC-2400N ip=10.0.0.138

I know, mixing portage with rpm is not a good idea.

Brother ADS-2400N scanner works with USB, Network connection, duplex
works as well.
The mail reason I bought this scanner is that it can be connected to
network and has TWAIN driver (my Fujitsu ScanSnap-junk doesn't have one).

However, following your suggestion I found "ebuild" in overlay for this
scanner, so I reversed the installation and used ebuild:
media-gfx/brother-ads2400n-bin

The only annoying feature in this scanner is that doesn't have "auto
crop" (windows does) auto-feeder does not work.  Scanning small receipts
showing black borders on both sides (snapscan borders are white - easier
to fax, print).
I'll need to ask Brother support if it possible to change the borders to
white background.

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 696 bytes --]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:31:16 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:

> However, following your suggestion I found "ebuild" in overlay for this
> scanner, so I reversed the installation and used ebuild:
> media-gfx/brother-ads2400n-bin
> 
> The only annoying feature in this scanner is that doesn't have "auto
> crop" (windows does) auto-feeder does not work.  Scanning small receipts
> showing black borders on both sides (snapscan borders are white - easier
> to fax, print).

Is this a feature of the driver or the software you are using? I used a
Brother AIO devices with Gscan2pdf and the ADF worked fine.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I used to have a handle on life, then it broke.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[thelma]

On 02/26/2017 03:10 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:31:16 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
>> However, following your suggestion I found "ebuild" in overlay for this
>> scanner, so I reversed the installation and used ebuild:
>> media-gfx/brother-ads2400n-bin
>>
>> The only annoying feature in this scanner is that doesn't have "auto
>> crop" (windows does) auto-feeder does not work.  Scanning small receipts
>> showing black borders on both sides (snapscan borders are white - easier
>> to fax, print).
> 
> Is this a feature of the driver or the software you are using? I used a
> Brother AIO devices with Gscan2pdf and the ADF worked fine.

It might be the feature of the driver (I think).
In Windows ADF works with Brother ADS-2400N but produces same black
border on the side.  So it must be Brother's driver.
Snapscan 1500 - ADF doesn't work with "xsane" but side boarders are white.

I was under impression "xsane" was the only scanner software available
for Linux.
I'll try gscan2pdf from overlay and report back.

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1252 bytes --]

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:34:24 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:

> >> The only annoying feature in this scanner is that doesn't have "auto
> >> crop" (windows does) auto-feeder does not work.  Scanning small
> >> receipts showing black borders on both sides (snapscan borders are
> >> white - easier to fax, print).  
> > 
> > Is this a feature of the driver or the software you are using? I used
> > a Brother AIO devices with Gscan2pdf and the ADF worked fine.  
> 
> It might be the feature of the driver (I think).
> In Windows ADF works with Brother ADS-2400N but produces same black
> border on the side.  So it must be Brother's driver.
> Snapscan 1500 - ADF doesn't work with "xsane" but side boarders are
> white.
> 
> I was under impression "xsane" was the only scanner software available
> for Linux.

SANE is the main backend driver software, but xsane is just a front end
to that which may or may not provide all the features you need.

> I'll try gscan2pdf from overlay and report back.

gscan2pdf is in the main tree now.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Crash: (v.) to terminate a program in the usual fashion, i.e. by locking
up the computer or setting fire to the printer. (n.) the process of such
termination.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[thelma]

On 02/26/2017 11:42 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:34:24 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
>>>> The only annoying feature in this scanner is that doesn't have "auto
>>>> crop" (windows does) auto-feeder does not work.  Scanning small
>>>> receipts showing black borders on both sides (snapscan borders are
>>>> white - easier to fax, print).  
>>>
>>> Is this a feature of the driver or the software you are using? I used
>>> a Brother AIO devices with Gscan2pdf and the ADF worked fine.  
>>
>> It might be the feature of the driver (I think).
>> In Windows ADF works with Brother ADS-2400N but produces same black
>> border on the side.  So it must be Brother's driver.
>> Snapscan 1500 - ADF doesn't work with "xsane" but side boarders are
>> white.
>>
>> I was under impression "xsane" was the only scanner software available
>> for Linux.
> 
> SANE is the main backend driver software, but xsane is just a front end
> to that which may or may not provide all the features you need.
> 
>> I'll try gscan2pdf from overlay and report back.
> 
> gscan2pdf is in the main tree now.

I'll resync next month and do an upgrade, thank for the pointer.

The black border on the scan (that I'm concern with right now) I think
it has to do with Brother driver, as I have SnapScan S1500 and the
border are white (suitable for printing, faxing etc.) I asked Brother
support for a solution, will wait for their reply.

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[thelma]

On 02/26/2017 11:42 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:34:24 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
>>>> The only annoying feature in this scanner is that doesn't have "auto
>>>> crop" (windows does) auto-feeder does not work.  Scanning small
>>>> receipts showing black borders on both sides (snapscan borders are
>>>> white - easier to fax, print).  
>>>
>>> Is this a feature of the driver or the software you are using? I used
>>> a Brother AIO devices with Gscan2pdf and the ADF worked fine.  
>>
>> It might be the feature of the driver (I think).
>> In Windows ADF works with Brother ADS-2400N but produces same black
>> border on the side.  So it must be Brother's driver.
>> Snapscan 1500 - ADF doesn't work with "xsane" but side boarders are
>> white.
>>
>> I was under impression "xsane" was the only scanner software available
>> for Linux.
> 
> SANE is the main backend driver software, but xsane is just a front end
> to that which may or may not provide all the features you need.
> 
>> I'll try gscan2pdf from overlay and report back.
> 
> gscan2pdf is in the main tree now.

I just tried gscan2pdf.
It does not offer auto-feed either; black borders still persist (so it
must be an issue with Brother driver.

In addition, I've noticed big difference is scan size of an image.
Small receipt size: ~4in x 3in saved as pdf B/W in 200dpi resolution:

gscan2pdf produced file size: 66.7kB
xsane produce file size: 12.4kB

So in file size perspective xsane produced much smaller size.
gscan2pdf provide crop tool to cut the borders, xsane does not have any
crop tools.

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 917 bytes --]

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:54:32 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:

> I just tried gscan2pdf.
> It does not offer auto-feed either; black borders still persist (so it
> must be an issue with Brother driver.

Sounds like it.

> In addition, I've noticed big difference is scan size of an image.
> Small receipt size: ~4in x 3in saved as pdf B/W in 200dpi resolution:
> 
> gscan2pdf produced file size: 66.7kB
> xsane produce file size: 12.4kB

File saving is a different process from scanning. For B/W scans, I use
djvu with gscan2pdf, the files are *much* smaller.
 
> So in file size perspective xsane produced much smaller size.
> gscan2pdf provide crop tool to cut the borders, xsane does not have any
> crop tools.

Xsane doesn't need to provide image manipulation as it works as a GIMP
plugin.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

WinErr 01D: System crash - We are unable to figure out our own code.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Network scanner [SOLVED]

[thelma]

On 02/27/2017 01:45 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:54:32 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
>> I just tried gscan2pdf.
>> It does not offer auto-feed either; black borders still persist (so it
>> must be an issue with Brother driver.
> 
> Sounds like it.
> 
>> In addition, I've noticed big difference is scan size of an image.
>> Small receipt size: ~4in x 3in saved as pdf B/W in 200dpi resolution:
>>
>> gscan2pdf produced file size: 66.7kB
>> xsane produce file size: 12.4kB
> 
> File saving is a different process from scanning. For B/W scans, I use
> djvu with gscan2pdf, the files are *much* smaller.

Just for curiosity can you scan small piece of paper 4in x 3in in B/W
200dpi in PDF; see what size you get.

--
Thelma