From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2FP5-0004R5-03 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 21:43:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j78Lenvr017636; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:40:49 GMT Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j78LYQ0D019396 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:34:27 GMT Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 4so71930nzn for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=foL7oAQGxCq9wNvLn9dGaxJ5cC70kgcepEoOAgGERqGN3Pyr0nBa+RBQitrJBCGhmoUxWdUrS/kN/AR+CbvPaZjqUF8Kg8+R+0JmXWMTNvM3pTemj5QxW66Gai8uscJSjJAYiQEsFyuvySxRWq7G0AxAnZF9GN9jh7tTsIr0ZmE= Received: by 10.36.251.2 with SMTP id y2mr399488nzh; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.15.17 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:34:48 -0700 From: Aaron Nichols To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re-post:How to get jfs root partition to properly fsck on power failure? In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_167_33269496.1123536888753" References: <200508071703.03038.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 949ece85-dd27-44c6-90d9-568a6ca90e30 X-Archives-Hash: 12d65d97c47df7d7ea5996b17165fbe0 ------=_Part_167_33269496.1123536888753 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/8/05, A. Khattri wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Aaron Nichols wrote: >=20 > > I was going to try the "non-genkernel" approach and see if that worked= =20 > any > > differently, as the grub configuration is quite different. I have=20 > examples > > of other distributions which work fine using jfs in this situation, but > > those do not use udev and none require the same options that genkernel= =20 > seems > > to. >=20 > I dont know if genkernel has much to do with it - OTOH, a lot of us dont > use genkernel because of people always reporting problems with it... Thanks, apparently you can add yet another reason not to use it. I=20 recompiled the kernel without using genkernel, used the grub.conf stanza=20 below, and now this works fine.=20 title=3DGentoo Linux 2.6.12-r6 root (hd0,1) kernel /kernel-2.6.12-gentoo-r6 root=3D/dev/sda6 udev hda=3Dide-scsi=20 hde=3Dide-scsi ro Very frustrating.=20 Thanks for helping.=20 Aaron ------=_Part_167_33269496.1123536888753 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/8/05, A. Khattri <ajai@bway.net> wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Aaron Nichols wrote:

> I was going to try the= "non-genkernel" approach and see if that worked any
> diff= erently, as the grub configuration is quite different. I have examples
> of other distributions which work fine using jfs in this situation, bu= t
> those do not use udev and none require the same options that genk= ernel seems
> to.

I dont know if genkernel has much to do with= it - OTOH, a lot of us dont
use genkernel because of people always reporting problems with it...

Thanks, apparently you can add yet another reason not to use it. I recompiled the kernel without using genkernel, used the grub.conf stanza below, and now this works fine.

title=3DGentoo Linux 2.6.12-r6
root (hd0,1)
kernel /kernel-2.6.12-gentoo-r6 root=3D/dev/sda6 udev hda=3Dide-scsi hde=3D= ide-scsi ro

Very frustrating.

Thanks for helping.

Aaron


------=_Part_167_33269496.1123536888753-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list