From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-53263-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GaA94-0001EM-ER
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:03:38 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9IBx23H013115;
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:59:02 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9IBsswo026520
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:54:55 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CAF648C4
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:54:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.752,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 27fOBMxYS+8J for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED3164494
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so733848nfa
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=Zs4UIE9yAtH8nARVrUP/r49CQyE+6GMpueruEsTzvQnYbyeyGCWGLxUqfYZJYD1uSYrthzoWUd3BV1FNtriRUKJxcEGYK9mpUg3ycWkNVXAZsGjj/94yPKk2RDmLWcJEUlco5m1Blz4zs5XDuoB/g/NLe52p9xKpUGvHg/NBeOA=
Received: by 10.82.101.3 with SMTP id y3mr1871742bub;
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.82.185.14 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a9fb46230610180454x3bb9a694id1990e352930f5d3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:54:45 +0200
From: "oskar kapala" <oskar.kapala@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: ati-driver update
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Archives-Salt: 1bba47de-aeef-44db-9244-f1e860500678
X-Archives-Hash: 77698c6874ab9df514507a964eca7e0f
Andrew Frink wrote:
>
> Blame ATI, they have 3 options, open the driver, keep up with Xorg dev,
> or piss people off. It as always seemed to me that they like option 3
>
Cynyr,
Yep, you are absolutely right. I knew that ati is not a good idea, but
this is laptop...
oskar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list