From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELRsH-00004T-Av for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:52:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8UKi8P1001752; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:44:08 GMT Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.193]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8UKeQv0010549 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:40:26 GMT Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so2712nfc for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:48:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=pFJUksOHcVQdwp387EWRYu45sGJrJ1kShAdA6a1eabrNHqdrBojbV0S9D9hPuTICrnqX0gg4LKVTKoWs6W/i8lMyEj8BAElmVg530YUoQ8LozgAHu2KYjnapojyEvFEyMXtnjkE3ObohN0yDxk09qLFBZPbN2xMMuLQzaYOeBXE= Received: by 10.48.3.12 with SMTP id 12mr130525nfc; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.142.10 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:48:03 +0200 From: Fernando Meira To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ccache taking way too long time In-Reply-To: <200510010138.39209.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2310_33036025.1128113283451" References: <200510010138.39209.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 87dbe6ac-1e15-4569-9873-24da7393a1fb X-Archives-Hash: b2044944c2d7c4ba9a38239bd2a78dc3 ------=_Part_2310_33036025.1128113283451 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 9/30/05, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > On Friday 30 September 2005 06:44, Fernando Meira wrote: > > drwxrwS--- 18 root portage 576 Sep 29 00:21 . > > Which portage version are you using? 2.0.51.22-r2? There was a bug in one > of > them that would cause ccache permissions to be updated everytime in > exactly > the above situation. What you have there is 2760 permissions. What you > need > is 2750. `chmod 2750 /root/.ccache` will fix it. Hi, I tried that and the first app I installed after (bin2iso ~ 7Kb) took longer waiting for ccache than compiling&installing. However, when emerging a second app there was no waiting time for ccache ajustment of permissions!! So it looks that it's woking! I'll run an update world later.. as a final test :) Thanks everyone!! Fernando ------=_Part_2310_33036025.1128113283451 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 9/30/05, Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org> wrote:
On Friday 30 September 2005 06:44, Fernando Meira wrote:
> drwxrwS---= 18 root portage 576 Sep 29 00:21 .

Which portage version are you us= ing? 2.0.51.22-r2? There was a bug in one of
them that would cause ccach= e permissions to be updated everytime in exactly
the above situation. What you have there is 2760 permissions. What you = need
is 2750. `chmod 2750 /root/.ccache` will fix it.
<= br> Hi, I tried that and the first app I installed after (bin2iso ~ 7Kb) took longer waiting for ccache than compiling&installing.
However, when emerging a second app there was no waiting time for ccache ajustment of permissions!! So it looks that it's woking!
I'll run an update world later.. as a final test :)
Thanks everyone!!

Fernando


------=_Part_2310_33036025.1128113283451-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list