From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8GLL-0005Nq-Nj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:56:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7PBsOOB004990; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:54:24 GMT Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7PBoKMN007044 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:50:35 GMT Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so102712nfc for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=n6h8F/wlMMTacpIyNg68ZwwLRijDL8LigQSP76YO9ETBLoBBuNPNirtckl2Y2Axz4dJaZLj6jguIS0uZW2ix1nJKXI1e/jR74IHGJKUJ2T73o6zkbNYiKtB2C03qFGEHWg9Fch5t+ikUY01ml7IfYmgySMYNEMrqhbYSZ/vXCK8= Received: by 10.48.3.12 with SMTP id 12mr92333nfc; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.142.10 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:51:32 +0000 From: Fernando Meira To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: migrating to gcc-3.4.4 In-Reply-To: <20050824233853.GA8382@princeton.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2278_11374219.1124970692885" References: <20050824233853.GA8382@princeton.edu> X-Archives-Salt: 98dadf45-070f-40a9-acc8-117947924a14 X-Archives-Hash: 9d9aae1a93d5c3426b568b147e9f64dc ------=_Part_2278_11374219.1124970692885 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/24/05, Willie Wong wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:30:11PM +0000, Fernando Meira wrote: > > Oh.. and by the way, how reliable is this prediction? > > (...) > > [ebuild N ] sys-apps/hdparm-5.9 > > [ebuild N ] sys-libs/pwdb-0.62 > > > > Estimated update time: 6 hours, 7 minutes. > > > > All system in 6h? It is something like 120 packages.. > > >=20 > What's the speed of your box? I recently did an emerge --emptytree > world on my 1.6G Pentium M laptop. It had 446 packages done in less > than 29 hours (I say less than because if would run long stretches at > a time and stop after failed downloads here and there because of > wireless problems... for all I know it could have been sitting there > waiting for me to fix my wireless router for a couple of hours or > more). >=20 > So if you have a comparably fast system, with not too many useflags > enabled, I'd say that 120 packages in 6 hours is quite possible. I have a P4-2.4GHz laptop.=20 I forgot to say that the estimation time was made by genlop. And was quite= =20 wrong! It took something like 11h to compile 112 packages, (though I've=20 interrupted while compiling gcc-3.3.6.. so it had to restart it anew). From= =20 this, I don't know if I should trust genlop anymore.. or is there something= =20 to configure so that it is more accurate? Just for the record, the migration to gcc-3.4.4 went just fine.. until now= =20 at least. :) ------=_Part_2278_11374219.1124970692885 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/24/05, Willie Wong <wwong@pr= inceton.edu> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:30:11PM +0000, Fernando Meira wrote:
> Oh.= . and by the way, how reliable is this prediction?
> (...)
> [e= build N ] sys-apps/hdparm-5.9
> [ebuild N ] sys-libs/pwdb-0.62
>
> Estimated update time: 6 hours, 7 minutes.
>
> All= system in 6h? It is something like 120 packages..
>

What's th= e speed of your box? I recently did an emerge --emptytree
world on my=20 1.6G Pentium M laptop. It had 446 packages done in less
than 29 hours (I= say less than because if would run long stretches at
a time and stop af= ter failed downloads here and there because of
wireless problems... for = all I know it could have been sitting there
waiting for me to fix my wireless router for a couple of hours or
mo= re).

So if you have a comparably fast system, with not too many usef= lags
enabled, I'd say that 120 packages in 6 hours is quite possible.

I have a P4-2.4GHz laptop.
I forgot to say that the estimation time was made by genlop. And was quite wrong! It took something like 11h to compile 112 packages, (though I've interrupted while compiling gcc-3.3.6.. so it had to restart it anew). From this, I don't know if I should trust genlop anymore.. or is there something to configure so that it is more accurate?

Just for the record, the migration to gcc-3.4.4 went just fine.. until now = at least. :)


------=_Part_2278_11374219.1124970692885-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list