From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F96ft-0004a7-Ak for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:21:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1EKK7Q2014772; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:20:07 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1EKDql2025025 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:13:52 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so1132416wra for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:13:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Ls8cUNmT5B2tD4XdIumbJ//EPBmJm5tthanQyQik77O8urUBTCvbo8TNzmJ2CwWRhOMba9TTwRqP1czxBZN4ZGmsC63NbzgnTxFSsLXBVQsfxX8BfsGP0HOQ1B5NHfyAHA459XWZYvOw5ufFwF0wz8L1JjJlhavhW/X5+n7N/WI= Received: by 10.65.153.12 with SMTP id f12mr2026943qbo; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:13:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.218.19 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:13:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:13:51 -0500 From: Ryan Holt To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is kde 3.5 stable enough? In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2618_30997037.1139948031266" References: <43F23E15.6030404@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: d8ccf93a-eef5-4479-9bcf-8fc97b2a49b0 X-Archives-Hash: 6c7862e736021b1ca0edc42fb6a6f3b9 ------=_Part_2618_30997037.1139948031266 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline If I were to setup a KDE 3.5 environment, what packages aside from kde-base should I setup with the ~amd64 exception in my /etc/portage/package.keyword= s ? On 2/14/06, Steven S. wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, b.n. wrote: > > > Hi, > > I still can't see KDE 3.5 in the stable x86. Since I'd like to try it, > but I > > also don't like to rely on unstable (i.e. crashing, misworking) apps > very > > much, I have a couple of questions for you... > > > > 1)What is the timeline for having 3.5 stable? If I have to wait still 1 > or 2 > > weeks, I don't mind, otherwise... > > > > 2)Does kde 3.5 pulls in a lot of ~x86 dependecies? > > > > 3)What are current known bugs/instabilities/issues/what of KDE 3.5packa= ges I > > should be aware of? I don't use KDE itself (I'm happy with Fluxbox) but > I use > > KDE apps very much (Konqueror,Kwrite,Kate,K3b...). > > > > Thanks! > > m. > > > > I've been using a totally ~x86 for a long time and never had an issue. KD= E > 3.5 is working very well, I've not had a crash. I think the main thing > going to be pulled in by anything is kdelibs, which you'd have to allow t= o > be ~x86. Just make sure you run emerge -pv packages and it will tell you > exactly what it's going to need. > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > ------=_Part_2618_30997037.1139948031266 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline If I were to setup a KDE 3.5 environment, what packages aside from kde-base= should I setup with the ~amd64 exception in my /etc/portage/package.keywor= ds ?

On 2/14/06, Steven S. <stupendousst= eve@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, b.n. wrote:

> Hi,
> I still can't see = KDE 3.5 in the stable x86. Since I'd like to try it, but I
> also don= 't like to rely on unstable (i.e. crashing, misworking) apps very
> m= uch, I have a couple of questions for you...
>
> 1)What is the timeline for having 3.5 stable? If I have to= wait still 1 or 2
> weeks, I don't mind, otherwise...
>
>= ; 2)Does kde 3.5 pulls in a lot of ~x86 dependecies?
>
> 3)What= are current known bugs/instabilities/issues/what of KDE=20 3.5 packages I
> should be aware of? I don't use KDE itself (I'm happ= y with Fluxbox) but I use
> KDE apps very much (Konqueror,Kwrite,Kate= ,K3b...).
>
> Thanks!
> m.
>

I've been using= a totally ~x86 for a long time and never had an issue. KDE
3.5 is working very well, I've not had a crash. I think the main thing<= br>going to be pulled in by anything is kdelibs, which you'd have to allow = to
be ~x86. Just make sure you run emerge -pv packages and it will tell = you
exactly what it's going to need.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



------=_Part_2618_30997037.1139948031266-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list