Re: [gentoo-user] is kde 3.5 stable enough?

[Ryan Holt <carpenike@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1333 bytes --]

If I were to setup a KDE 3.5 environment, what packages aside from kde-base
should I setup with the ~amd64 exception in my /etc/portage/package.keywords
?

On 2/14/06, Steven S. <stupendoussteve@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, b.n. wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I still can't see KDE 3.5 in the stable x86. Since I'd like to try it,
> but I
> > also don't like to rely on unstable (i.e. crashing, misworking) apps
> very
> > much, I have a couple of questions for you...
> >
> > 1)What is the timeline for having 3.5 stable? If I have to wait still 1
> or 2
> > weeks, I don't mind, otherwise...
> >
> > 2)Does kde 3.5 pulls in a lot of ~x86 dependecies?
> >
> > 3)What are current known bugs/instabilities/issues/what of KDE 3.5packages I
> > should be aware of? I don't use KDE itself (I'm happy with Fluxbox) but
> I use
> > KDE apps very much (Konqueror,Kwrite,Kate,K3b...).
> >
> > Thanks!
> > m.
> >
>
> I've been using a totally ~x86 for a long time and never had an issue. KDE
> 3.5 is working very well, I've not had a crash. I think the main thing
> going to be pulled in by anything is kdelibs, which you'd have to allow to
> be ~x86. Just make sure you run emerge -pv packages and it will tell you
> exactly what it's going to need.
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1707 bytes --]