Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

[Jakob <jak.gentoo@googlemail.com>]

On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss03@volumehost.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob <jak.gentoo@googlemail.com> wrote
> about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo':
> > I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the
> > GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use "-march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for
> > Core 2 Solo/Duo"
>
> > 3. They mentiont to use a amd64 profile, does this mean to use 64bit?
> > because I would like to stay with 32bit.
>
> Yes.  If you want to stick with 32-bit, your settings seem fine, although
> there may be a better -march setting available to you.
>
> --
> "If there's one thing we've established over the years,
> it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
> clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
> -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
>
>
>
Thaks for the quick reply.
On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use:
CFLAGS="-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
Is this wat you meant for better -march settings?
I was confused by the GWN because they didnt say its for 64bit only.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list