Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 01:18:39PM -0400 schrieb Rich Freeman:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:33 AM Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:

All AM5 CPUs have GPUs, but in general motherboards with video outputs
do not require the CPU to have a GPU built in.  The ports just don't
do anything if this is lacking, and you would need a dedicated GPU.

OK.  I read that a few times.  If I want to use the onboard video I have
to have a certain CPU that supports it?  Do those have something so I
know which is which?  Or do I read that as all the CPUs support onboard
video but if one plugs in a video card, that part of the CPU isn't
used?  The last one makes more sense but asking to be sure.
To use onboard graphics, you need a motherboard that supports it, and
a CPU that supports it.  I believe that internal graphics and an
external GPU card can both be used at the same time.  Note that
internal graphics solutions typically steal some RAM from other system
use, while an external GPU will have its own dedicated RAM (and those
can also make use of internal RAM too).
You can usually set the amount of graphics memory in the BIOS, depending on 
your need and RAM budget.

The 7600X has a built-in RDNA2 GPU.   All the original Ryzen zen4 CPUs
had GPU support, but it looks like they JUST announced a new line of
consumer zen4 CPUs that don't have it - they all end in an F right
now.
Yup.
G-series: big graphics for games n stuff, over 3 GFlops
F-Series: no graphics at all
rest: small graphics (around 0.8 GFlops max), ample for desktops and media

X-Series: high performance
non-X: same as X, but with lower frequencies

The X series are boosted to higher frequencies which give you a bit more 
performance, but at the cost of disproportionally increased power 
consumption and thus heat. They are simply run above the sweet spot in order 
to get the longest bargraph in benchmarks. You can “simulate” a non-X by 
running an X at a lower power target which can be set in the BIOS. In fact 
once I have a Ryzen, I thing I might limit its frequency to a bit below 
maximum just to avoid this inefficient region.

But I’ll be buying a G anyways. Its architecture is different, as it is 
basically a mobile chip in a desktop package.

As to the qestion about 5/7/9 in the other mail: it’s just a tier number. 
The more interesting is the 4-digit number. 600s and below are 6-core chips, 
700 and 800 have 8 cores, 900s have 12 cores or more.

The thousands give away the generation. AM5 is denoted by 7xxx. (Though 
there is another numbering scheme that does it quite differently, like 
7845H.)

Good info.  Clears up a little muddy water. 



        
In any case, if you google the CPU you're looking at it will tell you
if it supports integrated graphics.
I also recommend Wikipedia. It has tables of all kinds of stuff. Including 
all processors and their core features.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Ryzen_processors

If you don't play games, then definitely get integrated graphics.
Even if the CPU costs a tiny bit more, it will give you a free empty
16x PCIe slot at whatever speed the CPU supports (v5 in this case -
which is as good as you can get right now).
Not to mention a cut in power draw.

I might add, simply right clicking on the desktop can take sometimes 20
or 30 seconds for the menu to pop up.  Switching from one desktop to
another can take several seconds, sometimes 8 or 10.  This rig is
getting slower.
Wut. I am running plasma 6 on a Surface Go 1 whose Pentium Gold was slow 
even when it came out. It is half as fast as your 8350 and does not have 
such problems.
Benchmark FX 8350: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?id=1780
Benchmark Pentium Gold: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?id=3300

You have NVidia, right? Did you try the other graphics driver (i.e. 
proprietary ←→ foss)? Do those delays disappear if you disable 3D effects 
with Shift+Alt+F12?


I do have Nvidia and I use the Nvidia drivers.  Thought about using the ones in the kernel but just never did.  I don't think it is the video card tho.  I think some of it is all the hard drives I have installed and that they are busy.  I run torrent software all the time.  It stays very busy.  I actually set the connection speed to a little lower so that I have some network speed that isn't being used so that when I do something, I get some network bandwidth.  Plus, there's that growing software problem that always exists.  Software rarely shrinks. 



        
That sounds like RAM but I couldn't say for sure.  In any case a
modern system will definitely help.
Well, is the RAM full? My 10 years old PC has 32 Gigs and still runs very 
smooth (with Intel integrated graphics).


Generally, I use about 20 to 25GBs of RAM.  Mostly, Seamonkey, Firefox and the torrent software. 


Given the new rig can have 128GBs, I assume it comes in 32GB sticks.
Consumer DDR5 seems to come as large as 48GB, though that seems like
an odd size.
Actually, my product search page finds sticks with up to 96 GB. I believe 
the 48 size was introduced because for those to whom 32 was too small, 64 
was too expensive. DDR5 still is relatively pricey due to its higher 
electrical requirements.

-- Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. It’s quiet in the shadow, because you can’t hear the light.


Either way, the age of my current rig is a big reason I want to build a new one.  It's getting a lot of gray hairs. 

Dale

:-)  :-)