From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-103181-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1N6BhF-0001aA-Cj
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:24:54 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78016E0CA2;
Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:24:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-px0-f200.google.com (mail-px0-f200.google.com [209.85.216.200])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B8BE0CA2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:24:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pxi38 with SMTP id 38so325531pxi.10
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:24:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=1+cJrikRWzd+Y+tTQUWv06LMf9ugzp/6+N0Jjz7n8KQ=;
b=k0ovcN33OYgbkUkfaptsc9YyC5Qsj0sMAnsh0OA0M994LTAkq+LRQfFt0A6j7Ipe3j
m6RZcUycfcSqHTlLZGCdL/iPOd7ykCUnOs/HdNel0F3IugN10F187pIfTVITF9GH/2Lc
UFFyKVVT1ij9d3Vy8cfT1v3ALJUBNDTIl0ZvM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=kPLK3T6g8imhVer2/VcIIUyFTT6y9qCilsY+VcRr6BH8Tl/DzcRSYz+CBn0+XTVGbx
oiDE/LdAEcpEtmAGF43bX37OwyNFJSKyt6Dw8t+yZu1B4CxN+UcbTeMp8NW4WBu3BKDi
GQIonZXK1Xl768i2sMniFTf8CmySjNPdapd4g=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.248.38 with SMTP id v38mr371145wfh.280.1257463490551; Thu,
05 Nov 2009 15:24:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20091105132953.3d8bacb6@majikthise>
References: <87ws26s2z2.fsf@newsguy.com>
<200911041724.04669.wonko@wonkology.org> <87ocnirx2t.fsf@newsguy.com>
<4AF200D5.3090608@gmail.com> <4AF282A3.9090703@xunil.at>
<4AF2C40C.5050701@gmail.com> <20091105132953.3d8bacb6@majikthise>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:24:50 -0700
Message-ID: <a0811460911051524y35a91d68q75369d77d28b1d85@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Another angle on hal/xorg thread
From: Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 0f700be9-02c9-438f-97d2-ce5674cbf256
X-Archives-Hash: 2bbcf6894df8c30436c16a8d3958248e
In plenty of time for 2012 ;)
On 11/5/09, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:24:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> Didn't they kill hal 2001 before that movie was over?
>
> Just put it to sleep, so they could wake it up in 2010.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Of course it's not your day,
>