From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-102805-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1N4LkC-0007yX-6p
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:44:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73744E0AE0;
	Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85CE0AE0
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so1282566pwj.26
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=C3i5jQZJNzhMWTOF4JUI39frLPZNHsFs12sCXLsdefs=;
        b=YoY/MrxtUan+q978n7HgYNWyUiMX+tqs4yNW0SP8e7OuSWjU7pVNpYqPehCK4bFaxS
         pXH2eN2UKHsvK4J1KGUVrtyzcdJHXSiL8z8wDOEjPly2C3bJ26akHzb2vQ9lgrjelzDN
         OoOG49WFKv0cI+Zu4yggTxxgOFS/dU2e0YKS0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=da0eqUrI/aY8aFFVel193D5bb4DzVXvxV1bB36petqYCk+H1eY+oJfoPUj/AHaRBdD
         8TC5CT/bQc1C4689szyxVHa2DlSik+dAUcN9JmH8ewOCk0ExVdhBBSo4MRmOyxnBAICu
         XsgeETqqtZkPhKuH9feTSB01r0aQZUaAStdXI=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.129.7 with SMTP id g7mr313715wfn.336.1257025440827; Sat, 
	31 Oct 2009 14:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:44:00 -0600
Message-ID: <a0811460910311444o5fd58564y2c6df2264aaf39b1@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] emerge ignores /etcportage/package.mask
From: Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: dba15a94-b735-4a2b-9a33-bbf597900944
X-Archives-Hash: 4dab54895f4903ffaef531386d094eb0

Hi group,

>From the gentoo docs:

"Older cards such as the GeForce FX 5 series should use the 173.x
drivers, such as nvidia-drivers-173.14.15. For these cards, you should
mask >=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-174.00 in your
/etc/portage/package.mask file. This will prevent newer versions of
the driver which are incompatible with your card from being
installed."

But emerge ignores package.mask and insists on installing the newer
pkg. Searching reveals an old bug marked 'resolved' but nothing to say
what the resolution is.

Maxim