[gentoo-user] strange dmesg output

[gentoo-user] strange dmesg output

[Maxim Wexler]

Hi group,

Still sorting out the glitches in the new 2.6.30-r7 kernel.

eg the strange output of dmesg:

...
age:  1e 00 00 00 01 00
usb-storage: Bulk Command S 0x43425355 T 0x8 L 0 F 0 Trg 0 LUN 0 CL 6
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
usb-storage: Bulk Status S 0x53425355 T 0x8 R 0 Stat 0x1
usb-storage: -- transport indicates command failure
usb-storage: Issuing auto-REQUEST_SENSE
usb-storage: Bulk Command S 0x43425355 T 0x9 L 18 F 128 Trg 0 LUN 0 CL 6
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist: xfer 18 bytes, 1 entries
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 18/18
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk data transfer result 0x0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
...

and so on, for 2739 lines. Nothing about other drives, file sytems,
hardware, busses etc. When I plug in a usb key, for instance, dmesg
doesn't even notice although the log console(F12) makes a note of the
device. The earlier kernel acts "normally".

Did I leave something out of the kernel? I can't think what.

Maxim

Re: [gentoo-user] strange dmesg output

[Keith Dart]

=== On Sun, 10/25, Maxim Wexler wrote: ===
> Did I leave something out of the kernel? I can't think what.

===

It looks like you have USB debug turned on. I remember there was a
kernel that was released that had that. Normally it's off, but you
should turn it off if it's on.


-- Keith Dart

-- 

-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   Keith Dart <keith@dartworks.biz>
   public key: ID: 19017044
   <http://www.dartworks.biz/>
   =====================================================================

Re: [gentoo-user] strange dmesg output

[Maxim Wexler]

On 10/25/09, Keith Dart <keith@dartworks.biz> wrote:
> === On Sun, 10/25, Maxim Wexler wrote: ===
>> Did I leave something out of the kernel? I can't think what.
>
> ===
>
> It looks like you have USB debug turned on. I remember there was a
> kernel that was released that had that. Normally it's off, but you
> should turn it off if it's on.

#CONFIG_USB_DEBUG is not set

Re: [gentoo-user] strange dmesg output

[Maxim Wexler]

> #CONFIG_USB_DEBUG is not set
>

[edit]

CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG = y

I turned it off, recompiled, copied the kernel over and rebooted.
$dmesg still displays the verbose 'usb-storage' lines and excludes
everything else

here's a long thread on this same subject

https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2008-November/004121.html

I don't think he found a solution either.

The good news, the system can now see the soundcard. Before I had to
run alsaconf at every boot.  Is there a connection?

mw

[gentoo-user] Re: strange dmesg output

[Francesco Talamona]

On Monday 26 October 2009, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Did I leave something out of the kernel? I can't think what.
> 
Maybe you pulled in too much :-)

It could be some debug flag switched on in the USB storage subsystem.

Ciao
	Francesco

-- 
Linux Version 2.6.31-gentoo-r3, Compiled #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Oct 15 
07:09:01 CEST 2009
Two 2.9GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processors, 4GB RAM, 11659 Bogomips Total
aemaeth

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: strange dmesg output

[Maxim Wexler]

>
> It could be some debug flag switched on in the USB storage subsystem.

I'm not aware of such a "subsystem". Can you give an example?

Maxim

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: strange dmesg output

[Alan McKinnon]

On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:11:53 Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > It could be some debug flag switched on in the USB storage subsystem.
> 
> I'm not aware of such a "subsystem". Can you give an example?
> 
> Maxim
> 

It's a generic term applied to coherent chunks of the kernel.

The whole kernel is one large system.
The part (usually with a single maintainer) that deals with USB storage is a 
sub-system


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com